Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Philip Roberts

Internal Medicine Draper, UT Medical Doctor

NPI 1013012418 CMS profile 136498

74 E Kimballs Ln Ste 300, Draper, UT 84020

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,867

302 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Philip Roberts of Draper, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,867 across 302 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 89th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $458 24
2024 General $620 23
2023 General $664 36
2022 General $497 28
2020 General $807 52
2019 General $1,821 139

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Philip Roberts
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Philip Roberts were reported at $458. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Philip Roberts Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,821 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $807 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $0 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $497 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $664 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $620 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $458 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $677 30 payments
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $570 30 payments
  3. Abbott Laboratories $535 36 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $510 26 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $440 43 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $289 21 payments
  7. Allergan Inc. $274 18 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $265 17 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $228 13 payments
  10. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $157 9 payments
  11. Other $923 59 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,621 298 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $200 1 payment
  3. Education $28 2 payments
  4. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $19 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $290 27 payments
  2. FreeStyle Libre 3 $279 19 payments
  3. QULIPTA $257 13 payments
  4. Repatha $230 15 payments
  5. AIMOVIG $230 15 payments
  6. JARDIANCE $226 12 payments
  7. ELIQUIS $226 10 payments
  8. VRAYLAR $206 12 payments
  9. SPIRIVA RESPIMAT $203 12 payments
  10. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $175 13 payments
  11. Other $3,422 231 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 117 drugs

Part D claims

8,733

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,198,309

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

23.1%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 229 $338,338
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 121 $193,432
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 67 $95,511
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 40 $67,064
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 39 $60,308
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 41 $53,117
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 33 $48,634
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 33 $41,736
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 14 $40,228
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 27 $34,498

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 117 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 26 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$58,607

Of which drugs: $3,516

Medicare patients

246

Average age 76

Services billed

956

127 women, 119 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 50%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
Diabetes 33%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Osteoporosis 15%
Cancer 14%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 10 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $73
  • Lilly USA, LLC $19
$92 67 —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $35
$35 33 —
CAMZYOS
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $32
$32 — —
AREXVY
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $19
$19 — —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $19
$19 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 10 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

302 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record