Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Peter Nicholas

Wyomissing, PA Medical Doctor

NPI 1730185505 CMS profile 78886

2760 Century Blvd, Wyomissing, PA 19610

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,753

297 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Peter Nicholas of Wyomissing, PA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $5,753 across 297 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,403 61
2024 General $1,049 42
2023 General $907 46
2022 General $321 15
2021 General $165 9
2020 General $228 14
2019 General $1,679 110

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Peter Nicholas
  • Pennsylvania median
  • Middle half of Pennsylvania
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Peter Nicholas were reported at $1,403. Among 44,217 Pennsylvania profiles paid that year, the median was $168 and the middle half received between $50 and $597.

Show as a table
Year Peter Nicholas Pennsylvania median Middle half National median
2019 $1,679 $156 $46–$628 $163
2020 $228 $109 $33–$381 $114
2021 $165 $125 $35–$469 $132
2022 $321 $136 $40–$499 $149
2023 $907 $147 $46–$523 $160
2024 $1,049 $156 $46–$568 $164
2025 $1,403 $168 $50–$597 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $762 46 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $755 34 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $699 37 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $651 24 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $644 26 payments
  6. UCB, Inc. $632 29 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $322 17 payments
  8. Genentech USA, Inc. $272 18 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $255 24 payments
  10. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $221 13 payments
  11. Other $539 29 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,558 295 payments
  2. Education $195 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SAPHNELO $644 26 payments
  2. COSENTYX $504 29 payments
  3. Cimzia $486 23 payments
  4. RINVOQ $481 30 payments
  5. TREMFYA $410 13 payments
  6. BENLYSTA $322 17 payments
  7. SIMPONI ARIA $307 15 payments
  8. STELARA $241 11 payments
  9. Actemra $241 16 payments
  10. HUMIRA $234 15 payments
  11. Other $2,459 138 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 49 drugs

Part D claims

2,832

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,228,956

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

23%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Stelara Ustekinumab Brand 17 $457,249
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 32 $180,733
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 24 $175,747
Gammagard Liquid Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga Ov50 Brand 13 $127,392
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 17 $127,146
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 15 $102,173
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 258 $10,901
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 11 $6,435
Methylprednisolone Generic 250 $5,834
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 272 $4,765

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 49 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 84 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$930,566

Of which drugs: $804,209

Medicare patients

523

Average age 76

Services billed

72,446

393 women, 130 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 51%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Diabetes 20%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Depression 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 150 13,200 $269,833
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 13 3,800 $128,538
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 15 18,840 $88,834
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 130 1,426 $1,091
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 20 mg J1020 Office 25 67 $364
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 12 24 $185
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 25 37 $161
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 26 1,186 $123

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 15 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
SAPHNELO
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $213
$213 — —
Cimzia
  • UCB, Inc. $187
$187 — —
BENLYSTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $114
$114 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $86
$86 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $83
$83 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 15 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

297 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record