Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Peter Heyman

Adolescent Medicine Richmond, VA Medical Doctor

NPI 1114953569 CMS profile 141171

10410 Ridgefield Pkwy, Richmond, VA 23233

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,120

128 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Peter Heyman of Richmond, VA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,120 across 128 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Adolescent Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $374 15
2024 General $640 24
2023 General $483 23
2022 General $443 25
2021 General $206 13
2020 General $649 9
2019 General $324 19

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Peter Heyman
  • Adolescent Medicine median
  • Middle half of Adolescent Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Peter Heyman were reported at $374. Among 914 Adolescent Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $100 and the middle half received between $40 and $207.

Show as a table
Year Peter Heyman Adolescent Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $324 $95 $36–$198 $163
2020 $649 $50 $23–$111 $114
2021 $206 $67 $27–$179 $132
2022 $443 $79 $29–$189 $149
2023 $483 $100 $39–$194 $160
2024 $640 $93 $38–$195 $164
2025 $374 $100 $40–$207 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $500 1 payment
  2. Corium, Inc. $397 16 payments
  3. Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $257 8 payments
  4. Ironshore Pharmaceuticals Inc. $235 11 payments
  5. Sanofi Pasteur Inc. $217 10 payments
  6. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $195 12 payments
  7. kaleo, Inc. $188 11 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $179 10 payments
  9. Neos Therapeutics, LP $149 8 payments
  10. Tris Pharma Inc $124 8 payments
  11. Other $680 33 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,620 127 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $500 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Azstarys $397 16 payments
  2. Qelbree $225 6 payments
  3. GARDASIL 9 $184 11 payments
  4. MENQUADFI $158 7 payments
  5. JORNAY PM $152 7 payments
  6. AUVI-Q $152 9 payments
  7. VAXELIS $150 9 payments
  8. BEYFORTUS $128 6 payments
  9. VAXNEUVANCE $118 7 payments
  10. ORALAIR $110 1 payment
  11. Other $1,762 98 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Records

128 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Adolescent Medicine in Virginia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record