Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2023–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Perry Fuchs

Rheumatology Denver, CO Medical Doctor

NPI 1497287122 CMS profile 8582501

7111 E Lowry Blvd Ste 200, Denver, CO 80230

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,464

101 records reported · program years 2023–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2023–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Perry Fuchs of Denver, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,464 across 101 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 50th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,236 54
2024 General $774 25
2023 General $453 22

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Perry Fuchs
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Perry Fuchs were reported at $1,236. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Perry Fuchs Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $0 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $0 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $0 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $453 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $774 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $1,236 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $598 16 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $350 11 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $223 11 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $222 13 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $164 8 payments
  6. Radius Health, Inc. $139 7 payments
  7. Celltrion USA Inc. $105 4 payments
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $87 3 payments
  9. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $70 4 payments
  10. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $53 2 payments
  11. Other $453 22 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,401 98 payments
  2. Education $63 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. SAPHNELO $350 11 payments
  2. COSENTYX $222 13 payments
  3. Bimzelx $197 10 payments
  4. TAVNEOS $189 3 payments
  5. EVENITY $183 4 payments
  6. BENLYSTA $147 7 payments
  7. Tymlos $139 7 payments
  8. KRYSTEXXA $111 4 payments
  9. ACTHAR $70 4 payments
  10. YUFLYMA $63 3 payments
  11. Other $801 36 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 21 drugs

Part D claims

895

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$699,755

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

31.1%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 26 $213,130
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 14 $166,572
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 13 $157,205
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 24 $143,805
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 161 $7,421
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 133 $3,523
Prednisone Generic 163 $1,554
Sulfasalazine Dr Sulfasalazine Brand 37 $1,522
Leflunomide Generic 19 $1,145
Tramadol Hcl Generic 111 $962

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 21 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 65 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,422,203

Of which drugs: $1,310,164

Medicare patients

473

Average age 74

Services billed

74,069

379 women, 94 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 58%
Osteoporosis 55%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Depression 22%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
COPD 15%
Diabetes 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 62 10,200 $345,167
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 97 7,440 $151,872
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 20 26,640 $122,640
Injection, rituximab, 10 mg J9312 Office 11 1,680 $102,595
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 42 3,780 $94,213
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 20 9,450 $81,704
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 22 6,600 $59,437
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 16 80 $424
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 168 354 $179
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 18 421 $98

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 15 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TAVNEOS
  • Amgen Inc. $146
$146 — —
EVENITY
  • Amgen Inc. $113
$113 — 9,450
SAPHNELO
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $69
$69 — —
BENLYSTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $66
$66 — —
Tymlos
  • Radius Health, Inc. $63
$63 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 15 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

101 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Colorado

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record