Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Perkin Shiu

Cardiovascular Disease Walnut Creek, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1134375272 CMS profile 323403

1450 Treat Blvd, Suite 220B, Walnut Creek, CA 94597

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$45,017

809 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$19,298 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Perkin Shiu of Walnut Creek, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $45,017 across 809 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $19,298 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Cardiovascular Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $8,720 95
2024 General $4,414 104
2023 General $9,911 135
2022 General $3,735 171
2021 General $3,870 84
2020 General $6,122 88
2019 General $8,244 132

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Perkin Shiu
  • Cardiovascular Disease median
  • Middle half of Cardiovascular Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Perkin Shiu were reported at $8,720. Among 16,617 Cardiovascular Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $432 and the middle half received between $132 and $1,252.

Show as a table
Year Perkin Shiu Cardiovascular Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $8,244 $450 $127–$1,392 $163
2020 $6,122 $242 $77–$751 $114
2021 $3,870 $335 $101–$1,037 $132
2022 $3,735 $395 $121–$1,211 $149
2023 $9,911 $443 $136–$1,283 $160
2024 $4,414 $450 $136–$1,323 $164
2025 $8,720 $432 $132–$1,252 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $9,083 65 payments
  2. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $8,419 48 payments
  3. Boston Scientific Corporation $6,301 36 payments
  4. Biotronik Inc. $6,061 188 payments
  5. ZOLL Services LLC (A/K/A ZOLL LifeCor Corp) $3,888 29 payments
  6. Impulse Dynamics (USA) Inc. $1,020 20 payments
  7. AOP Health US, LLC $812 1 payment
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $766 42 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $758 38 payments
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $733 27 payments
  11. Other $7,175 315 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $23,439 10 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $20,183 772 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $800 2 payments
  4. Education $595 25 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ELIQUIS Cardiovascular;Metabolic Disease $8,867 45 payments
  2. ELIQUIS Cardiovascular $8,060 31 payments
  3. WATCHMAN Access System $5,323 7 payments
  4. LifeVest $3,888 29 payments
  5. BioMonitor $1,293 59 payments
  6. Solia $1,194 46 payments
  7. Rivacor $918 40 payments
  8. Edora $918 40 payments
  9. Acticor $918 40 payments
  10. OPTIMIZER $853 15 payments
  11. Other $17,986 656 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 58 drugs

Part D claims

7,395

Median for Cardiology: 2,533

Drug cost

$2,429,488

Median for Cardiology: $485,213

Branded share of claims

29.8%

Median for Cardiology: 25.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 894 $1,198,004
Vyndamax Tafamidis Brand 11 $241,747
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 185 $233,934
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 156 $211,364
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 153 $188,399
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 109 $165,420
Multaq Dronedarone Hcl Brand 37 $62,548
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 23 $19,303
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 729 $13,306
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 601 $10,042

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 58 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,782 Part D prescribers listed as Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 77 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$632,959

Of which drugs: $25,140

Medicare patients

2,478

Average age 78

Services billed

11,336

1,282 women, 1,196 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 47%
Atrial fibrillation 42%
Ischemic heart disease 39%
Chronic kidney disease 37%
Heart failure 31%
Diabetes 30%
Depression 26%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, regadenoson, 0.1 mg J2785 Office 151 605 $3,619

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 16 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
WAINUA
$134 — —
Kerendia
$123 — —
Arcalyst
$114 — —
ELIQUIS
$104 894 —
LEQVIO
$61 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 16 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

809 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Cardiovascular Disease in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record