Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Payal Suthar

Rheumatology Duluth, GA Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1679702781 CMS profile 524896

3650 Steve Reynolds Blvd, Duluth, GA 30096

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,142

99 records reported · program year 2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program year 2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Payal Suthar of Duluth, GA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,142 across 99 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 48th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,142 99

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Payal Suthar
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Payal Suthar were reported at $2,142. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Payal Suthar Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $0 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $0 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $0 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $0 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $0 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,142 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $629 23 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $318 11 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $316 16 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $233 17 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $124 5 payments
  6. Invivyd Inc $90 3 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $83 4 payments
  8. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $77 3 payments
  9. Radius Health, Inc. $53 2 payments
  10. Organon LLC $42 5 payments
  11. Other $179 10 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program year 2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,043 98 payments
  2. Education $99 1 payment
Products named General payments · program year 2025
  1. RINVOQ $400 12 payments
  2. TREMFYA $318 11 payments
  3. COSENTYX $233 17 payments
  4. SKYRIZI $229 11 payments
  5. KRYSTEXXA $147 8 payments
  6. SAPHNELO $124 5 payments
  7. PEMGARDA $90 3 payments
  8. Otezla $83 4 payments
  9. ORENCIA $83 4 payments
  10. ACTHAR $77 3 payments
  11. Other $388 26 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 19 drugs

Part D claims

1,581

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$709,776

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

42.3%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Amjevita(Cf) Autoinjector Adalimumab-Atto Brand 237 $270,854
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 36 $220,078
Xeljanz Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 51 $139,832
Otezla Apremilast Brand 12 $53,136
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 235 $7,655
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 293 $4,891
Leflunomide Generic 148 $3,799
Mycophenolate Mofetil Generic 50 $3,798
Prednisone Generic 278 $2,442
Febuxostat Generic 13 $664

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 19 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 9 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$5,024

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

13

Average age 67

Services billed

203

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Alzheimer's or dementia 0%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

99 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Georgia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record