Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Paula Toth-Russell

Neurology Mishawaka, IN Medical Doctor

NPI 1588756712 CMS profile 207577

611 E Douglas Rd, Suite 305, Mishawaka, IN 46545

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$79,508

747 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Paula Toth-Russell of Mishawaka, IN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $79,508 across 747 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,559 73
2024 General $1,605 68
2023 General $3,515 97
2022 General $7,270 115
2021 General $9,010 125
2020 General $13,347 108
2019 General $43,203 161

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Paula Toth-Russell
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Paula Toth-Russell were reported at $1,559. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Paula Toth-Russell Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $43,203 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $13,347 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $9,010 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $7,270 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $3,515 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $1,605 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $1,559 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $33,623 73 payments
  2. EMD Serono, Inc. $19,505 61 payments
  3. Genzyme Corporation $6,125 23 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $4,965 62 payments
  5. LivaNova USA, Inc. $3,865 42 payments
  6. Biogen, Inc. $2,388 49 payments
  7. Celgene Corporation $939 44 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $695 40 payments
  9. Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $565 16 payments
  10. UCB, Inc. $455 26 payments
  11. Other $6,384 311 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $52,789 32 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $15,187 691 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $7,739 4 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $3,624 17 payments
  5. Education $169 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ajovy Central Nervous System $13,601 18 payments
  2. Mavenclad Neurology $12,139 19 payments
  3. AUSTEDO $10,909 25 payments
  4. AJOVY Central Nervous System $8,919 26 payments
  5. Mavenclad Neurology $6,733 20 payments
  6. AUBAGIO $5,914 13 payments
  7. BOTOX $3,781 5 payments
  8. VUMERITY $1,949 22 payments
  9. VNS THERAPY SENTIVA MODEL 1000 GENERATOR $1,719 9 payments
  10. VNS - Sentiva $1,715 18 payments
  11. Other $12,813 626 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 94 drugs

Part D claims

4,627

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$3,488,896

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

33.3%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Kesimpta Pen Ofatumumab Brand 90 $913,329
Firdapse Amifampridine Phosphate Brand 12 $591,534
Copaxone Glatiramer Acetate Brand 33 $266,401
Vumerity Diroximel Fumarate Brand 29 $250,070
Epidiolex Cannabidiol (Cbd) Brand 13 $137,143
Glatiramer Acetate Generic 56 $131,388
Avonex (4 Pack) Interferon Beta-1a Brand 11 $88,400
Avonex Pen (4 Pack) Interferon Beta-1a Brand 12 $87,724
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 59 $85,158
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 40 $79,089

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 94 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 26 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$123,955

Of which drugs: $47,056

Medicare patients

638

Average age 71

Services billed

10,852

380 women, 258 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Arthritis 45%
Depression 40%
Diabetes 30%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Alzheimer's or dementia 25%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Osteoporosis 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 14 9,800 $47,057

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 32 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ZEPOSIA
  • Celgene Corporation $257
$257 — —
FYCOMPA
  • CATALYST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. $221
$221 45 —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $75
$75 40 —
Rystiggo
  • UCB, Inc. $65
$65 — —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $62
$62 59 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 32 with Patron

Records

747 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Indiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record