Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Paul Wallace

Dermatology Beverly Hills, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1063494474 CMS profile 184779

8920 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 327, Beverly Hills, CA 90211

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$387,626

754 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$33,969

Paid to them · 4 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$6,693,962 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Paul Wallace of Beverly Hills, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $387,626 across 754 general payments and $33,969 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $6,693,962 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $79,840 150
2024 General $40,670 101
2023 General $35,917 101
2022 General $16,688 98
2021 General $20,537 67
2020 General $24,977 56
2020 Research $126 2
2019 General $168,996 181
2019 Research $33,843 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Paul Wallace
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Paul Wallace were reported at $79,840. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Paul Wallace Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $168,996 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $24,977 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $20,537 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $16,688 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $35,917 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $40,670 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $79,840 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UCB, Inc. $128,881 220 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $107,565 169 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $74,212 100 payments
  4. Celgene Corporation $36,009 36 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $27,627 41 payments
  6. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $8,608 18 payments
  7. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $533 16 payments
  8. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $523 22 payments
  9. LEO Pharma AS $450 1 payment
  10. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $432 10 payments
  11. Other $2,786 121 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $277,375 95 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $53,335 16 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $40,950 154 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $15,872 486 payments
  5. Education $95 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Bimzelx $118,277 167 payments
  2. HUMIRA $61,600 85 payments
  3. COSENTYX Dermatology $46,306 39 payments
  4. Otezla Dermatology $36,009 36 payments
  5. SKYRIZI $34,434 72 payments
  6. Otezla Inflammation $25,127 40 payments
  7. COSENTYX Immunology $17,499 24 payments
  8. COSENTYX Dermatology $10,322 34 payments
  9. RINVOQ $2,258 7 payments
  10. Cimzia $686 45 payments
  11. Other $6,078 261 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $33,969 4 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 28 drugs

Part D claims

1,075

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$1,052,052

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

30.1%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 16 $323,742
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 41 $290,933
Odomzo Sonidegib Phosphate Brand 12 $162,286
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 36 $132,717
Zoryve Roflumilast Brand 73 $66,047
Vtama Tapinarof Brand 20 $27,001
Opzelura Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 14 $26,728
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 101 $4,330
Clindamycin Phosphate Generic 39 $2,980
Tretinoin Generic 32 $2,653

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 28 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 22 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$26,180

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

115

Average age 69

Services billed

377

63 women, 52 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 55%
Diabetes 43%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Ischemic heart disease 20%
COPD 19%
Depression 17%
Osteoporosis 14%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 18 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Bimzelx
$39,394 — —
VTAMA
$229 20 —
COSENTYX
$142 41 —
SKYRIZI
$124 16 —
Zoryve
$112 73 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 18 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

758 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record