Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Paul Utrie

Rheumatology Green Bay, WI Medical Doctor

NPI 1326065368 CMS profile 14319

2223 Lime Kiln Rd, Suite 1, Green Bay, WI 54311

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,783

252 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Paul Utrie of Green Bay, WI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,783 across 252 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 56th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $657 31
2024 General $1,000 59
2023 General $657 54
2022 General $412 29
2021 General $197 17
2020 General $435 34
2019 General $425 28

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Paul Utrie
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Paul Utrie were reported at $657. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Paul Utrie Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $425 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $435 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $197 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $412 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $657 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $1,000 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $657 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,237 162 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $854 57 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $252 9 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $94 6 payments
  5. Sandoz Inc. $69 3 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $59 3 payments
  7. Genentech USA, Inc. $43 2 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $38 2 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $35 2 payments
  10. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $21 1 payment
  11. Other $81 5 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,764 251 payments
  2. Education $19 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ Immunology $1,380 100 payments
  2. HUMIRA $397 26 payments
  3. TAVNEOS Inflammation $290 27 payments
  4. RINVOQ Immunology $274 23 payments
  5. TREMFYA $252 9 payments
  6. Enbrel $165 14 payments
  7. SKYRIZI $156 12 payments
  8. SIMPONI ARIA $155 2 payments
  9. Tavneos Not Applicable $131 4 payments
  10. KRYSTEXXA $127 2 payments
  11. Other $692 44 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 58 drugs

Part D claims

5,235

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$2,696,804

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

30.3%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 76 $727,414
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 30 $432,209
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 47 $311,241
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 23 $212,545
Humira Adalimumab Brand 17 $165,607
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 24 $148,776
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 14 $119,563
Cosentyx (2 Syringes) Secukinumab Brand 14 $116,533
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 14 $98,565
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 13 $94,963

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 58 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 83 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,788,497

Of which drugs: $1,674,199

Medicare patients

438

Average age 72

Services billed

129,244

299 women, 139 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 66%
Osteoporosis 36%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Depression 24%
Diabetes 22%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Heart failure 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 42 13,250 $448,475
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 28 60,881 $286,360
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 32 16,050 $145,183
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 54 4,900 $119,463
Injection, rituximab, 10 mg J9312 Office 14 1,750 $106,630
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 32 152 $727
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 184 561 $286
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 26 2,491 $260
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 17 875 $200
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 22 51 $33

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 13 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $343
$343 47 —
KRYSTEXXA
  • Amgen Inc. $127
$127 — —
Enbrel
  • Amgen Inc. $120
$120 36 —
TAVNEOS
  • Amgen Inc. $97
$97 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $88
$88 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 13 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

252 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record