Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2023 Reported 2019–2023 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Paul Schmidt

Internal Medicine Logan, UT Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1598992570 CMS profile 1120776

1350 N 500 E, Budge Clinic Internal Medicine, Logan, UT 84341

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$346

4 records reported · program years 2019–2023

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2023

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2023, Paul Schmidt of Logan, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $346 across 4 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 52nd percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2023 General $19 1
2019 General $327 3

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Paul Schmidt
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Paul Schmidt were reported at $0. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Paul Schmidt Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $327 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $0 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $0 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $0 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $19 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $0 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $0 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $312 2 payments
  2. Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. $19 1 payment
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $15 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. Food and Beverage $331 3 payments
  2. Education $15 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. t:slim X2 Insulin Pump with Control-IQ $19 1 payment
  2. SPIRIVA RESPIMAT $15 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 172 drugs

Part D claims

12,237

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,091,177

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

20.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 173 $154,241
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 115 $135,238
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 73 $85,830
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 134 $83,235
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 75 $68,325
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 50 $56,802
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 28 $44,748
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 30 $38,532
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 17 $34,896
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 21 $26,332

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 172 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 31 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$59,189

Of which drugs: $9,947

Medicare patients

198

Average age 75

Services billed

971

121 women, 77 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 65%
Arthritis 41%
Diabetes 38%
Chronic kidney disease 38%
Depression 33%
Osteoporosis 22%
Ischemic heart disease 20%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 28 28 $4,229
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 11 11 $2,814
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 31 31 $2,536

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

4 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2023

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record