Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Paul Deutsch

Internal Medicine Norwich, CT Medical Doctor

NPI 1811990013 CMS profile 172999

86 New London Tpke, Norwich, CT 06360

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$25,428

1,419 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Paul Deutsch of Norwich, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $25,428 across 1,419 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,321 151
2024 General $3,931 163
2023 General $3,037 161
2022 General $3,649 207
2021 General $4,520 262
2020 General $3,358 221
2019 General $3,613 254

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Paul Deutsch
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Paul Deutsch were reported at $3,321. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Paul Deutsch Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $3,613 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $3,358 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $4,520 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $3,649 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $3,037 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $3,931 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $3,321 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $2,324 137 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,028 105 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,978 153 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $1,701 99 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $1,664 101 payments
  6. Astellas Pharma US Inc $1,295 52 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $1,208 63 payments
  8. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $1,022 68 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $975 67 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $701 35 payments
  11. Other $10,533 539 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $24,387 1,375 payments
  2. Education $766 42 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $275 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,626 122 payments
  2. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,454 97 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $1,297 100 payments
  4. UBRELVY $1,024 45 payments
  5. EVENITY $652 28 payments
  6. ELIQUIS $580 36 payments
  7. BELSOMRA $580 35 payments
  8. AREXVY $539 18 payments
  9. Vascepa $478 31 payments
  10. FARXIGA $472 26 payments
  11. Other $23,985 1,373 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 262 drugs

Part D claims

25,186

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$2,922,522

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

22.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 366 $467,725
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 364 $424,548
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 355 $397,776
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 157 $190,409
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 93 $136,093
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 65 $81,191
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 13 $80,478
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 57 $66,638
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 66 $61,905
Trintellix Vortioxetine Hydrobromide Brand 52 $56,352

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 262 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 47 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$320,972

Of which drugs: $1,093

Medicare patients

695

Average age 76

Services billed

4,791

314 women, 381 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 47%
Arthritis 45%
Diabetes 33%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
COPD 21%
Depression 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 12 12 $865
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 13 109 $98

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 49 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AREXVY
$394 52 —
ZTLido
$346 — —
VOQUEZNA
$287 — —
Veozah
$201 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$170 65 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 49 with Patron

Records

1,419 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Connecticut

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record