Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Patricia Thompson

Pediatrics Magnolia, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1518980465 CMS profile 23764

6875 Fm 1488 Rd Ste 1400, Magnolia, TX 77354

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,757

787 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Patricia Thompson of Magnolia, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,757 across 787 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Pediatrics profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,160 119
2024 General $2,108 116
2023 General $1,803 120
2022 General $2,062 129
2021 General $2,267 138
2020 General $1,021 72
2019 General $1,336 93

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Patricia Thompson
  • Pediatrics median
  • Middle half of Pediatrics
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Patricia Thompson were reported at $2,160. Among 22,296 Pediatrics profiles paid that year, the median was $97 and the middle half received between $37 and $210.

Show as a table
Year Patricia Thompson Pediatrics median Middle half National median
2019 $1,336 $86 $31–$183 $163
2020 $1,021 $49 $22–$110 $114
2021 $2,267 $68 $27–$158 $132
2022 $2,062 $77 $30–$173 $149
2023 $1,803 $88 $33–$190 $160
2024 $2,108 $94 $34–$206 $164
2025 $2,160 $97 $37–$210 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,295 156 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,222 70 payments
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $991 58 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $900 63 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $804 48 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $705 47 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $441 22 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $439 26 payments
  9. Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $421 31 payments
  10. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $379 24 payments
  11. Other $4,161 242 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,725 786 payments
  2. Education $32 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,184 93 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $1,064 78 payments
  3. FARXIGA $680 37 payments
  4. Wegovy $515 29 payments
  5. JARDIANCE $478 28 payments
  6. NURTEC ODT $434 23 payments
  7. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $425 26 payments
  8. VRAYLAR $424 28 payments
  9. NUZYRA $421 31 payments
  10. Saxenda $383 26 payments
  11. Other $10,504 640 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 151 drugs

Part D claims

8,942

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$715,116

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

20.7%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 164 $185,750
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 80 $97,142
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 48 $68,948
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 42 $64,330
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 21 $27,899
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 21 $25,763
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 21 $25,750
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 26 $22,553
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 18 $17,925
Janumet Sitagliptin Phos/Metformin Hcl Brand 18 $14,798

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 151 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 33 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$78,085

Of which drugs: $9,219

Medicare patients

366

Average age 73

Services billed

1,555

278 women, 88 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 71%
Arthritis 45%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Diabetes 22%
Depression 16%
Cancer 13%
Osteoporosis 13%
Chronic kidney disease 11%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 60 61 $4,718
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 15 15 $4,344

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 32 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ZEPBOUND
$187 — —
GEMTESA
$152 — —
Wegovy
$146 — —
AIRSUPRA
$137 — —
JARDIANCE
$134 80 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 32 with Patron

Records

787 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pediatrics in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record