Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2020–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Patricia Melville

Neurology East Setauket, NY Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1033440896 CMS profile 1189852

179 Belle Mead Rd, East Setauket, NY 11733

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$337,338

562 records reported · program years 2020–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2020–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Patricia Melville of East Setauket, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $337,338 across 562 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $87,360 139
2024 General $58,839 111
2023 General $59,863 110
2022 General $89,529 120
2021 General $38,495 76
2020 General $3,252 6

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Patricia Melville
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Patricia Melville were reported at $87,360. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Patricia Melville Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $3,252 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $38,495 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $89,529 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $59,863 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $58,839 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $87,360 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Genentech USA, Inc. $69,787 66 payments
  2. TG Therapeutics, Inc. $62,768 65 payments
  3. Horizon Therapeutics plc $47,662 76 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $39,546 74 payments
  5. EMD Serono, Inc. $39,533 80 payments
  6. Biogen, Inc. $29,969 53 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $18,536 32 payments
  8. Celgene Corporation $12,552 47 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $6,550 16 payments
  10. Genzyme Corporation $5,379 12 payments
  11. Other $5,056 41 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $210,370 145 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $41,138 24 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $38,918 87 payments
  4. Honoraria $28,952 20 payments
  5. Food and Beverage $17,961 286 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. OCREVUS $69,702 60 payments
  2. BRIUMVI $62,003 64 payments
  3. UPLIZNA Uplizna $47,662 76 payments
  4. UPLIZNA Inflammation/Rare Disease $31,093 63 payments
  5. ZEPOSIA $28,492 74 payments
  6. Mavenclad $27,798 32 payments
  7. TYSABRI $14,227 26 payments
  8. VUMERITY $12,513 23 payments
  9. KESIMPTA $5,349 11 payments
  10. AUBAGIO $3,278 5 payments
  11. Other $8,737 82 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 65 drugs

Part D claims

2,375

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$3,304,060

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

48.4%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ocrevus Ocrelizumab Brand 18 $680,356
Vumerity Diroximel Fumarate Brand 21 $253,334
Mayzent Siponimod Brand 23 $220,488
Teriflunomide Generic 43 $215,035
Rebif Interferon Beta-1a/Albumin Brand 14 $147,275
Lamictal Lamotrigine Brand 92 $145,368
Avonex (4 Pack) Interferon Beta-1a Brand 12 $139,726
Zonegran Zonisamide Brand 43 $124,420
Briviact Brivaracetam Brand 65 $108,126
Dimethyl Fumarate Generic 17 $106,516

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 65 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 27 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$46,624

Of which drugs: $15,339

Medicare patients

223

Average age 65

Services billed

727

151 women, 72 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 62%
Arthritis 42%
Depression 35%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Diabetes 23%
Osteoporosis 19%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
COPD 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 36 73 $37
Injection, magnesium sulfate, per 500 mg J3475 Office 11 17 $7

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BRIUMVI
  • TG Therapeutics, Inc. $27,590
$27,590 — —
ZEPOSIA
  • Celgene Corporation $6,722
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $3,604
$10,326 — —
OCREVUS
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $1,786
$1,786 18 —
VUMERITY
  • Biogen, Inc. $216
$216 21 —
TYSABRI
  • Biogen, Inc. $153
$153 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

562 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record