Nurse Practitioner Program year 2022 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Patricia Gerber

Nurse Practitioner Rochester, MN Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1285008649 CMS profile 10548226

200 1St St Sw, Rochester, MN 55905

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$495

1 record reported · program year 2022

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program year 2022

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2022, Patricia Gerber of Rochester, MN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $495 across 1 general payment and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 57th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2022 General $495 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Patricia Gerber
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Patricia Gerber were reported at $0. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Patricia Gerber Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $0 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $495 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $0 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $0 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $0 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2022
  1. Epizyme, Inc., $495 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program year 2022
  1. Honoraria $495 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 4 drugs

Part D claims

105

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$209,976

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

36.2%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Venclexta Venetoclax Brand 15 $209,141
Acyclovir Generic 44 $661
Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim Brand 23 $98
Prednisone Generic 23 $75

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 51 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$631,081

Of which drugs: $579,584

Medicare patients

426

Average age 73

Services billed

60,267

209 women, 217 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 60%
Arthritis 47%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Diabetes 23%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Osteoporosis 22%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Depression 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, immune globulin, (gammagard liquid), non-lyophilized, (e.g., liquid), 500 mg J1569 Office 33 4,370 $149,041
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 22 6,720 $55,920
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 11 9,880 $46,751
Injection, remdesivir, 1 mg J0248 Office 53 8,600 $40,109
Injection, infliximab-axxq, biosimilar, (avsola), 10 mg Q5121 Office 22 2,028 $39,269
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, up to 40 mg J2920 Office 12 13 $39
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 16 169 $36

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

1 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Minnesota

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2022

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record