Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Patricia Dinger

Allergy San Antonio, TX Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1770709370 CMS profile 34596

540 Madison Oak Dr Ste 450, San Antonio, TX 78258

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,074

634 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$2,270 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2021

Through program year 2025, Patricia Dinger of San Antonio, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,074 across 634 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $2,270 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 83rd percentile of Allergy profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,301 132
2024 General $2,586 105
2023 General $2,293 87
2022 General $2,432 96
2021 General $1,982 82
2020 General $1,342 70
2019 General $1,138 62

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Patricia Dinger
  • Allergy median
  • Middle half of Allergy
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Patricia Dinger were reported at $3,301. Among 526 Allergy profiles paid that year, the median was $1,143 and the middle half received between $226 and $2,504.

Show as a table
Year Patricia Dinger Allergy median Middle half National median
2019 $1,138 $506 $151–$1,337 $163
2020 $1,342 $409 $108–$1,162 $114
2021 $1,982 $549 $125–$1,485 $132
2022 $2,432 $666 $161–$1,594 $149
2023 $2,293 $780 $186–$1,916 $160
2024 $2,586 $1,031 $271–$2,196 $164
2025 $3,301 $1,143 $226–$2,504 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,137 67 payments
  2. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $2,005 65 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,807 105 payments
  4. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $1,146 53 payments
  5. CSL Behring $995 48 payments
  6. Grifols USA, LLC $829 41 payments
  7. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $700 29 payments
  8. Genentech USA, Inc. $596 26 payments
  9. kaleo, Inc. $552 20 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $534 21 payments
  11. Other $3,774 159 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,883 627 payments
  2. Education $101 3 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $90 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $1,718 55 payments
  2. FASENRA $1,105 24 payments
  3. DUPIXENT Immunology $1,088 38 payments
  4. CUVITRU $1,038 47 payments
  5. NUCALA $886 39 payments
  6. Xembify $785 38 payments
  7. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $772 55 payments
  8. Xolair $577 25 payments
  9. Hizentra $549 26 payments
  10. AUVI-Q $527 19 payments
  11. Other $6,789 300 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 21 drugs

Part D claims

685

Median for Allergy/ Immunology: 449

Drug cost

$216,669

Median for Allergy/ Immunology: $169,700

Branded share of claims

41.8%

Median for Allergy/ Immunology: 37.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 18 $72,964
Xolair Omalizumab Brand 28 $55,808
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 46 $39,373
Breo Ellipta Fluticasone/Vilanterol Brand 19 $9,906
Epinephrine Generic 45 $9,039
Xhance Fluticasone Propionate Brand 13 $8,109
Arnuity Ellipta Fluticasone Furoate Brand 25 $5,229
Ryaltris Olopatadine Hcl/Mometasone Brand 16 $3,955
Budesonide-Formoterol Fumarate Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate Brand 15 $2,619
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa Albuterol Sulfate Brand 70 $1,783

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 21 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,579 Part D prescribers listed as Allergy/ Immunology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 34 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$114,997

Of which drugs: $439

Medicare patients

177

Average age 73

Services billed

10,671

116 women, 61 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Arthritis 53%
Diabetes 34%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Depression 18%
COPD 14%
Cancer 14%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 19 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $332
  • SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC $248
$580 18 —
Xembify
  • Grifols USA, LLC $283
$283 — —
NUCALA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $229
$229 — —
XOLAIR
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $134
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $79
$213 28 —
FASENRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $174
$175 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 19 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

634 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Allergy in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record