Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Parand Alavi

Internal Medicine Glenn Dale, MD Medical Doctor

NPI 1801976139 CMS profile 172303

12150 Annapolis Rd, Suite 308, Glenn Dale, MD 20769

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$18,120

1,007 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Parand Alavi of Glenn Dale, MD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $18,120 across 1,007 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,676 130
2024 General $2,788 131
2023 General $2,917 147
2022 General $3,078 170
2021 General $2,797 164
2020 General $1,604 104
2019 General $2,260 161

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Parand Alavi
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Parand Alavi were reported at $2,676. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Parand Alavi Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,260 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,604 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,797 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $3,078 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,917 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,788 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,676 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,225 143 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,971 105 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,638 85 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $1,442 86 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,096 56 payments
  6. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $1,069 59 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $1,059 61 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $688 41 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $671 42 payments
  10. Horizon Therapeutics plc $568 38 payments
  11. Other $5,693 291 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $18,087 1,003 payments
  2. Education $33 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,667 100 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $1,428 84 payments
  3. FARXIGA $1,198 63 payments
  4. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $755 37 payments
  5. MOUNJARO $710 39 payments
  6. LINZESS $641 31 payments
  7. UBRELVY $573 32 payments
  8. JARDIANCE $465 29 payments
  9. SOLIQUA 100/33 $460 25 payments
  10. Repatha $459 27 payments
  11. Other $16,435 960 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 70 drugs

Part D claims

1,993

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$268,406

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

28.9%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 55 $78,165
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 40 $47,553
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 43 $41,258
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 11 $19,435
Toujeo Max Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 15 $17,816
Janumet Sitagliptin Phos/Metformin Hcl Brand 13 $12,574
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 12 $11,385
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 11 $7,225
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 13 $5,721
Lantus Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 14 $2,799

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 70 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 41 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$72,318

Of which drugs: $327

Medicare patients

313

Average age 74

Services billed

1,266

241 women, 72 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 52%
Diabetes 50%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Heart failure 15%
Osteoporosis 15%
Cancer 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Influenza vaccine, trivalent, 0.5 ml dosage 90658 Office 14 14 $300

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 41 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
FARXIGA
$196 — —
RYBELSUS
$184 11 —
Ozempic
$184 40 —
MOUNJARO
$131 55 —
JARDIANCE
$117 12 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 41 with Patron

Records

1,007 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Maryland

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record