Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Pamela Trantham

Nurse Practitioner Johnson City, TN Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1669795399 CMS profile 11025876

303 Med Tech Pkwy, Suite 100, Johnson City, TN 37604

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,704

430 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Pamela Trantham of Johnson City, TN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,704 across 430 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,834 116
2024 General $1,830 108
2023 General $1,287 82
2022 General $723 49
2021 General $1,030 75

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Pamela Trantham
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Pamela Trantham were reported at $1,834. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Pamela Trantham Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $1,030 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $723 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $1,287 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $1,830 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $1,834 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,134 88 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $882 47 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $714 50 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $439 29 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $432 28 payments
  6. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $346 19 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $295 18 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $290 20 payments
  9. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $265 16 payments
  10. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $223 15 payments
  11. Other $1,684 100 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,644 429 payments
  2. Education $60 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. UBRELVY $502 32 payments
  2. QULIPTA $417 28 payments
  3. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $384 25 payments
  4. XIFAXAN $346 19 payments
  5. FARXIGA $337 20 payments
  6. Ozempic $329 32 payments
  7. VRAYLAR $324 27 payments
  8. RYBELSUS $313 31 payments
  9. Wegovy $301 14 payments
  10. AIRSUPRA $297 16 payments
  11. Other $5,118 325 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 137 drugs

Part D claims

8,409

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$593,648

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

18.6%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 89 $101,127
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 90 $84,722
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 61 $60,085
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 56 $44,655
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 32 $44,464
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 23 $26,222
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 52 $25,699
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 21 $18,893
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 33 $17,105
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 16 $15,683

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 137 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 80 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$77,477

Of which drugs: $6,688

Medicare patients

114

Average age 75

Services billed

3,933

67 women, 47 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 54%
Ischemic heart disease 44%
Diabetes 40%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Depression 23%
Osteoporosis 19%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 25 25 $2,036
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 33 178 $932
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 14 100 $35

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 41 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $172
$172 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $137
$137 — —
TEZSPIRE
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $125
$125 — —
Wegovy
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $100
$100 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $77
$77 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 41 with Patron

Records

430 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Tennessee

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record