Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Paige Harris

Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care Montgomery, AL Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1992957575 CMS profile 10492231

1722 Pine St Ste 700, Montgomery, AL 36106

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$464,826

2,257 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Paige Harris of Montgomery, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $464,826 across 2,257 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $152,308 550
2024 General $103,957 510
2023 General $113,023 505
2022 General $55,738 393
2021 General $39,800 299

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Paige Harris
  • Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Paige Harris were reported at $152,308. Among 11,827 Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care profiles paid that year, the median was $152 and the middle half received between $48 and $458.

Show as a table
Year Paige Harris Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care median Middle half National median
2019 $0 — — $163
2020 $0 — — $114
2021 $39,800 $123 $38–$327 $132
2022 $55,738 $130 $44–$369 $149
2023 $113,023 $144 $49–$410 $160
2024 $103,957 $146 $48–$433 $164
2025 $152,308 $152 $48–$458 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $185,699 320 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $73,213 258 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $61,127 259 payments
  4. Argenx US, Inc. $19,935 75 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $18,519 119 payments
  6. Genentech USA, Inc. $16,428 62 payments
  7. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $16,323 94 payments
  8. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc. $13,349 38 payments
  9. TG Therapeutics, Inc. $11,342 35 payments
  10. Acorda Therapeutics, Inc $8,688 65 payments
  11. Other $40,205 932 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $302,670 216 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $61,351 24 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $52,822 233 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $42,730 1,768 payments
  5. Honoraria $2,625 2 payments
  6. Education $1,682 10 payments
  7. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $945 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. INGREZZA $169,592 292 payments
  2. UBRELVY $57,376 149 payments
  3. QULIPTA $28,883 80 payments
  4. Rystiggo $27,944 76 payments
  5. Nayzilam $18,619 36 payments
  6. VYVGART $17,947 46 payments
  7. OCREVUS $16,413 57 payments
  8. Ponvory $16,226 86 payments
  9. Ongentys $15,359 52 payments
  10. Epidiolex $13,349 38 payments
  11. Other $85,752 1,451 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 114 drugs

Part D claims

9,446

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$4,141,505

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

25.8%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ingrezza Valbenazine Tosylate Brand 69 $677,514
Gammaplex Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga 0-50 Brand 72 $493,791
Privigen Immun Glob G(Igg)/Pro/Iga 0-50 Brand 38 $465,507
Kesimpta Pen Ofatumumab Brand 39 $385,760
Octagam Immun Globg(Igg)/Malt/Iga Ov50 Brand 15 $242,671
Gamunex-C Immune Globul G/Gly/Iga Avg 46 Brand 16 $210,914
Austedo Deutetrabenazine Brand 16 $191,856
Gammagard Liquid Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga Ov50 Brand 11 $159,605
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 96 $148,983
Epidiolex Cannabidiol (Cbd) Brand 31 $141,380

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 114 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 21 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$210,748

Of which drugs: $177,025

Medicare patients

381

Average age 73

Services billed

9,982

217 women, 164 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 61%
Diabetes 36%
Ischemic heart disease 36%
Depression 33%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Alzheimer's or dementia 22%
Atrial fibrillation 18%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 62 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
INGREZZA
$35,968 69 —
Nayzilam
$13,766 — —
UBRELVY
$11,390 41 —
QULIPTA
$8,656 31 —
Epidiolex
$5,360 31 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 62 with Patron

Records

2,257 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record