Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Paige Charleston

Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery Elkhorn, NE Medical Doctor

NPI 1366555369 CMS profile 152563

717 N 190Th Plz, Ste. 1100, Elkhorn, NE 68022

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,229

167 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Paige Charleston of Elkhorn, NE is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,229 across 167 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 68th percentile of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $754 24
2024 General $915 27
2023 General $1,206 35
2022 General $946 27
2021 General $1,687 22
2020 General $247 7
2019 General $475 25

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Paige Charleston
  • Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery median
  • Middle half of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Paige Charleston were reported at $754. Among 802 Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery profiles paid that year, the median was $412 and the middle half received between $133 and $1,300.

Show as a table
Year Paige Charleston Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery median Middle half National median
2019 $475 $358 $132–$1,270 $163
2020 $247 $198 $86–$642 $114
2021 $1,687 $361 $118–$1,182 $132
2022 $946 $410 $128–$1,175 $149
2023 $1,206 $434 $152–$1,344 $160
2024 $915 $494 $193–$1,331 $164
2025 $754 $412 $133–$1,300 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Axonics Modulation Technologies, Inc. $1,999 23 payments
  2. Caldera Medical, Inc $996 8 payments
  3. Astellas Pharma US Inc $461 18 payments
  4. Boston Scientific Corporation $387 8 payments
  5. Baxter Healthcare $383 4 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $360 23 payments
  7. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $357 18 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $258 19 payments
  9. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. $174 2 payments
  10. Mayne Pharma Inc. $152 12 payments
  11. Other $703 32 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,022 160 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $773 2 payments
  3. Gift $236 3 payments
  4. Education $199 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Axonics r-SNM System Urology $1,414 16 payments
  2. Bulkamid $1,036 6 payments
  3. Desara $806 7 payments
  4. Axonics $561 5 payments
  5. PREMARIN $280 19 payments
  6. ESTRING $219 16 payments
  7. MYFEMBREE $214 11 payments
  8. Advantage System $189 4 payments
  9. Axonics r-SNM System Urology $177 3 payments
  10. Da Vinci Surgical System $174 2 payments
  11. Other $1,994 101 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 37 drugs

Part D claims

1,991

Median for Obstetrics & Gynecology: 65

Drug cost

$262,155

Median for Obstetrics & Gynecology: $3,585

Branded share of claims

44.2%

Median for Obstetrics & Gynecology: 25.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 171 $95,456
Gemtesa Vibegron Brand 114 $74,417
Estradiol Generic 308 $22,147
Premarin Estrogens, Conjugated Brand 43 $13,895
Methenamine Hippurate Generic 166 $10,274
Veozah Fezolinetant Brand 15 $7,894
Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro Nitrofurantoin Monohyd/M-Cryst Brand 266 $6,236
Fosfomycin Tromethamine Generic 26 $4,603
Mirabegron Er Mirabegron Brand 14 $4,100
Trospium Chloride Er Trospium Chloride Brand 18 $4,027

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 37 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 24,311 Part D prescribers listed as Obstetrics & Gynecology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 85 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$231,112

Of which drugs: $44,352

Medicare patients

524

Average age 74

Services billed

13,288

524 women, 0 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 63%
Arthritis 54%
Osteoporosis 26%
Depression 24%
Cancer 14%
Chronic kidney disease 13%
Diabetes 12%
Atrial fibrillation 11%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 25 8,100 $40,375

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $86
$86 114 —
MYFEMBREE
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $47
$47 — —
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $45
$45 — 8,100
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $27
$27 15 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

167 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery in Nebraska

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record