Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Pablo Dubon

Infectious Disease Sarasota, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1225532625 CMS profile 7226122

1425 S Osprey Ave, Sarasota, FL 34239

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$961

14 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Pablo Dubon of Sarasota, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $961 across 14 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 62nd percentile of Infectious Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $176 3
2024 General $129 2
2023 General $351 4
2022 General $169 3
2021 General $119 1
2019 General $15 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Pablo Dubon
  • Infectious Disease median
  • Middle half of Infectious Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Pablo Dubon were reported at $176. Among 3,905 Infectious Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $188 and the middle half received between $57 and $766.

Show as a table
Year Pablo Dubon Infectious Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $15 $190 $60–$862 $163
2020 $0 $124 $32–$606 $114
2021 $119 $148 $38–$905 $132
2022 $169 $166 $50–$834 $149
2023 $351 $171 $57–$787 $160
2024 $129 $176 $52–$752 $164
2025 $176 $188 $57–$766 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $541 5 payments
  2. ViiV Healthcare Company $152 2 payments
  3. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $119 1 payment
  4. Shionogi Inc $87 3 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $24 1 payment
  6. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $23 1 payment
  7. Shire North American Group Inc $15 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $961 14 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $238 2 payments
  2. AREXVY $209 2 payments
  3. APRETUDE $124 1 payment
  4. Epclusa $119 1 payment
  5. Fetroja $87 3 payments
  6. RUKOBIA $28 1 payment
  7. AVYCAZ $24 1 payment
  8. DALVANCE $24 1 payment
  9. TEFLARO $24 1 payment
  10. PIFELTRO $23 1 payment
  11. Other $38 2 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 27 drugs

Part D claims

698

Median for Infectious Disease: 268

Drug cost

$596,861

Median for Infectious Disease: $217,595

Branded share of claims

36%

Median for Infectious Disease: 45.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 78 $341,510
Triumeq Abacavir/Dolutegravir/Lamivudi Brand 13 $48,334
Descovy Emtricitabine/Tenofov Alafenam Brand 21 $47,717
Isentress Raltegravir Potassium Brand 22 $43,732
Tivicay Dolutegravir Sodium Brand 16 $35,358
Etravirine Generic 16 $17,564
Darunavir Generic 12 $9,555
Cefepime Hcl Generic 27 $7,768
Daptomycin Generic 26 $6,578
Imipenem-Cilastatin Sodium Imipenem/Cilastatin Sodium Brand 17 $6,342

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 27 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,546 Part D prescribers listed as Infectious Disease; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 63 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$651,232

Of which drugs: $269,530

Medicare patients

1,880

Average age 78

Services billed

135,262

880 women, 1,000 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 70%
Ischemic heart disease 57%
Chronic kidney disease 48%
Atrial fibrillation 44%
Depression 44%
Heart failure 42%
Diabetes 41%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, dalbavancin, 5 mg J0875 Office 36 11,100 $131,438
Injection, ertapenem sodium, 500 mg J1335 Office 134 601 $5,384
Injection, daptomycin, 1 mg J0878 Office 91 106,950 $4,556
Injection, cilastatin sodium; imipenem, per 250 mg J0743 Office 15 502 $2,973
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 94 1,276 $458
Injection, cefepime hydrochloride, 500 mg J0692 Office 36 406 $406
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 213 524 $270
5% dextrose/water (500 ml = 1 unit) J7060 Office 26 26 $35

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

2 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AREXVY
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $103
$103 — —
Fetroja
  • Shionogi Inc $27
$27 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

14 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Infectious Disease in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record