Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Paarth Shah

Neurology Gilbert, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1356695894 CMS profile 2790743

3507 S Mercy Rd Ste 101, Gilbert, AZ 85297

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$283,345

1,997 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$15,555 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2021–2022

Through program year 2025, Paarth Shah of Gilbert, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $283,345 across 1,997 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $15,555 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $61,417 264
2024 General $26,810 254
2023 General $27,990 305
2022 General $23,243 366
2021 General $44,014 292
2020 General $40,309 241
2019 General $59,562 275

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Paarth Shah
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Paarth Shah were reported at $61,417. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Paarth Shah Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $59,562 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $40,309 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $44,014 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $23,243 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $27,990 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $26,810 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $61,417 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Acorda Therapeutics, Inc $87,239 162 payments
  2. US WorldMeds, LLC $59,168 164 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $54,574 421 payments
  4. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $32,565 75 payments
  5. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC $10,294 60 payments
  6. Medtronic, Inc. $6,645 102 payments
  7. GRT US Holding, Inc. $4,812 11 payments
  8. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $4,309 21 payments
  9. Medtronic USA, Inc. $3,340 52 payments
  10. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. $2,115 6 payments
  11. Other $18,285 923 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $166,215 109 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $40,923 1,775 payments
  3. Honoraria $36,590 15 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $20,648 8 payments
  5. Travel and Lodging $17,677 75 payments
  6. Education $1,292 15 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. INBRIJA Parkinsons Disease $66,834 82 payments
  2. DUOPA $50,798 134 payments
  3. INGREZZA $32,253 64 payments
  4. APOKYN Neurology $23,316 91 payments
  5. INBRIJA Parkinson's Disease $20,181 74 payments
  6. CREXONT $8,809 14 payments
  7. Apokyn Apomorphine Hydrochloride $8,063 33 payments
  8. Qutenza $4,812 11 payments
  9. PERCEPT PC BRAINSENSE $4,462 60 payments
  10. REXULTI $4,208 13 payments
  11. Other $34,149 1,608 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 54 drugs

Part D claims

3,399

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$1,230,509

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

49.8%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ingrezza Valbenazine Tosylate Brand 34 $279,830
Gammaked Immune Globul G/Gly/Iga Avg 46 Brand 32 $251,963
Austedo Deutetrabenazine Brand 23 $250,263
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 37 $180,765
Rytary Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 59 $58,937
Carbidopa-Levodopa Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 804 $30,747
Neupro Rotigotine Brand 25 $27,844
Botox Onabotulinumtoxina Brand 15 $21,024
Rexulti Brexpiprazole Brand 12 $18,357
Carbidopa-Levodopa Er Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 217 $17,824

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 54 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 29 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$78,228

Of which drugs: $37,175

Medicare patients

371

Average age 78

Services billed

8,066

164 women, 207 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 62%
Ischemic heart disease 45%
Depression 44%
Chronic kidney disease 43%
Diabetes 35%
Atrial fibrillation 31%
Alzheimer's or dementia 30%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 34 6,500 $29,730

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 33 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
INGREZZA
$10,533 34 —
Apokyn
$7,915 — —
REXULTI
$3,573 12 —
BOTOX
$421 15 6,500
Leqembi
$262 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 33 with Patron

Records

1,997 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record