Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Oscar Kuruvilla

Ophthalmology Lancaster, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1861711558 CMS profile 175049

1240 Colonial Commons Ct, Lancaster, SC 29720

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,115

294 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Oscar Kuruvilla of Lancaster, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,115 across 294 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 90th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,139 72
2024 General $1,432 34
2023 General $1,996 49
2022 General $1,460 40
2021 General $1,215 27
2020 General $761 26
2019 General $2,112 46

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Oscar Kuruvilla
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Oscar Kuruvilla were reported at $3,139. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Oscar Kuruvilla Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,112 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $761 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $1,215 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $1,460 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $1,996 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $1,432 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $3,139 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Alcon Vision LLC $7,362 149 payments
  2. Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. $1,086 22 payments
  3. Astellas Pharma US Inc $882 18 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $510 26 payments
  5. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $442 18 payments
  6. Bausch & Lomb, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $383 8 payments
  7. NotalVision $284 4 payments
  8. Genentech USA, Inc. $221 12 payments
  9. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $169 4 payments
  10. Allergan Inc. $158 4 payments
  11. Other $617 29 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,732 289 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $284 4 payments
  3. Education $98 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Clareon Ophthalmology $2,566 46 payments
  2. LenSx Ophthalmology $1,441 28 payments
  3. Clareon Ophthalmology $935 18 payments
  4. Izervay $673 13 payments
  5. LenSx Ophthalmology $508 10 payments
  6. UNITY $507 7 payments
  7. Catalys Laser System $495 7 payments
  8. PANOPTIX $378 11 payments
  9. TORIC $356 9 payments
  10. Tecnis Multifocal Family of 1-piece IOLS $339 8 payments
  11. Other $4,621 161 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 16 drugs

Part D claims

1,441

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$72,626

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

24.8%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Combigan Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 40 $14,584
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 37 $13,384
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 245 $7,620
Vyzulta Latanoprostene Bunod Brand 26 $7,381
Rhopressa Netarsudil Mesylate Brand 15 $6,567
Brimonidine Tartrate-Timolol Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 64 $6,000
Latanoprost Generic 342 $2,859
Travoprost Generic 26 $2,804
Ketorolac Tromethamine Generic 128 $2,641
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 90 $2,188

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 16 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 59 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$3,182,849

Of which drugs: $2,567,901

Medicare patients

1,074

Average age 77

Services billed

78,078

644 women, 430 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 42%
Diabetes 37%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Depression 19%
COPD 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg J2777 Office 182 67,260 $1,845,359
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 67 632 $414,808
Injection, avacincaptad pegol, 0.1 mg J2782 Office 38 3,260 $282,008
Injection, bevacizumab, 10 mg J9035 Office 22 54 $2,952

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 10 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Izervay
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $169
$169 — 3,260
LUMIGAN
  • AbbVie, Inc. $53
$53 37 —
OZURDEX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $41
$41 — —
OXERVATE
  • Dompe US, Inc. $30
$30 — —
DURYSTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $29
$29 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 10 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

294 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record