Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2022–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Oscar Diaz

Nurse Practitioner Mission Hills, CA Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1043980980 CMS profile 10900017

11133 N Sepulveda Blvd, Mission Hills, CA 91346

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,691

128 records reported · program years 2022–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2022–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Oscar Diaz of Mission Hills, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,691 across 128 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 78th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $437 41
2024 General $853 65
2023 General $387 21
2022 General $14 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Oscar Diaz
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Oscar Diaz were reported at $437. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Oscar Diaz Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $0 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $14 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $387 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $853 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $437 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $778 81 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $498 27 payments
  3. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $147 7 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $65 4 payments
  5. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $32 1 payment
  6. Pfizer Inc. $30 1 payment
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $28 2 payments
  8. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $27 1 payment
  9. RedHill Biopharma Inc. $25 1 payment
  10. Shield Therapeutics Inc $23 1 payment
  11. Other $37 2 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $1,691 128 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Repatha Cardiology $501 52 payments
  2. MOUNJARO $402 23 payments
  3. Otezla $375 35 payments
  4. ZEPBOUND $299 15 payments
  5. REPATHA Cardiovascular $156 28 payments
  6. Kerendia $147 7 payments
  7. Wegovy $65 4 payments
  8. GARDASIL 9 $32 1 payment
  9. GARDASIL $32 1 payment
  10. VAXNEUVANCE $32 1 payment
  11. Other $327 14 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 8 drugs

Part D claims

175

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$1,760

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

0%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Metformin Hcl Generic 37 $375
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 32 $317
Losartan Potassium Generic 23 $279
Omeprazole Generic 19 $219
Fluticasone Propionate Generic 11 $193
Glipizide Generic 14 $151
Amlodipine Besylate Generic 24 $147
Lisinopril Generic 15 $78

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 11 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $237
$237 — —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $209
$209 — —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $113
$113 — —
ZEPBOUND
  • Lilly USA, LLC $104
$104 — —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $52
$52 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 11 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

128 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record