Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Omar Ahmad

Neurology Taylor, MI Medical Doctor

NPI 1568623643 CMS profile 343746

11780 Telegraph Rd Ste 100, Taylor, MI 48180

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$14,276

889 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Omar Ahmad of Taylor, MI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $14,276 across 889 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 79th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,558 143
2024 General $2,566 146
2023 General $2,604 152
2022 General $2,231 141
2021 General $1,203 85
2020 General $844 53
2019 General $2,271 169

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Omar Ahmad
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Omar Ahmad were reported at $2,558. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Omar Ahmad Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,271 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $844 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $1,203 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $2,231 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $2,604 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $2,566 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $2,558 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,581 92 payments
  2. UCB, Inc. $1,348 100 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,263 91 payments
  4. Biogen, Inc. $1,046 67 payments
  5. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $597 30 payments
  6. EMD Serono, Inc. $554 41 payments
  7. Argenx US, Inc. $518 26 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $500 30 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $397 19 payments
  10. Eisai Inc. $369 21 payments
  11. Other $6,103 372 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $13,959 871 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $202 13 payments
  3. Education $102 4 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $12 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KESIMPTA $719 52 payments
  2. QULIPTA $645 43 payments
  3. UBRELVY $565 31 payments
  4. INGREZZA $557 27 payments
  5. TYSABRI $514 33 payments
  6. Briviact $467 30 payments
  7. VUMERITY $447 30 payments
  8. Nayzilam $403 34 payments
  9. NURTEC ODT $393 23 payments
  10. AIMOVIG $373 21 payments
  11. Other $10,779 664 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 83 drugs

Part D claims

6,491

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$2,363,129

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

21.5%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Privigen Immun Glob G(Igg)/Pro/Iga 0-50 Brand 19 $464,059
Kesimpta Pen Ofatumumab Brand 30 $289,860
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 126 $237,765
Rebif Rebidose Interferon Beta-1a/Albumin Brand 15 $195,482
Vumerity Diroximel Fumarate Brand 23 $184,975
Tecfidera Dimethyl Fumarate Brand 11 $124,390
Gammagard Liquid Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga Ov50 Brand 13 $111,545
Avonex Pen (4 Pack) Interferon Beta-1a Brand 15 $107,125
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 57 $73,164
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 47 $68,164

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 83 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 33 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$306,244

Of which drugs: $22,820

Medicare patients

281

Average age 66

Services billed

9,791

167 women, 114 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Arthritis 53%
Diabetes 38%
Depression 33%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
COPD 27%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Alzheimer's or dementia 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 84 1,776 $1,261
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 31 122 $63
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 37 65 $60
Injection, ondansetron hydrochloride, per 1 mg J2405 Office 14 100 $7

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 40 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KESIMPTA
$269 30 —
Nayzilam
$228 11 —
INGREZZA
$197 — —
VYVGART Hytrulo
$123 — —
BOTOX
$103 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 40 with Patron

Records

889 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Michigan

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record