Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Noreen Russo

Physician Assistant West End, NC Physician Assistant

NPI 1952508046 CMS profile 10833253

4204 Murdocksville Rd, West End, NC 27376

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,991

567 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Noreen Russo of West End, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,991 across 567 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,831 137
2024 General $3,099 174
2023 General $1,866 101
2022 General $1,969 94
2021 General $1,228 61

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Noreen Russo
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Noreen Russo were reported at $2,831. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Noreen Russo Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $1,228 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $1,969 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $1,866 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $3,099 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $2,831 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $3,897 203 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,139 80 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $1,018 53 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $793 53 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $697 32 payments
  6. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC $588 27 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $585 31 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $275 6 payments
  9. Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $256 10 payments
  10. Genzyme Corporation $255 7 payments
  11. Other $1,489 65 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,912 563 payments
  2. Education $79 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Otezla $1,868 105 payments
  2. Enbrel Inflammation $1,673 78 payments
  3. Enbrel Inflammation $1,589 89 payments
  4. TREMFYA $1,050 74 payments
  5. COSENTYX $673 31 payments
  6. Cimzia $668 36 payments
  7. RINVOQ $588 41 payments
  8. BENLYSTA $566 30 payments
  9. TAVNEOS $438 21 payments
  10. IDACIO $361 17 payments
  11. Other $4,448 196 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 47 drugs

Part D claims

3,618

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$6,718,510

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

34.9%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 258 $2,379,299
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 201 $1,581,894
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 99 $650,839
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 46 $358,296
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 31 $259,668
Kevzara Sarilumab Brand 41 $207,737
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 34 $196,720
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 29 $189,170
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 23 $185,335
Otezla Apremilast Brand 33 $171,351

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 47 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 67 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$278,257

Of which drugs: $186,159

Medicare patients

436

Average age 74

Services billed

27,267

306 women, 130 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 28%
Diabetes 27%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
COPD 25%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Depression 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 24 2,700 $91,173
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 23 13,600 $48,676
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 11 440 $42

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Enbrel
$411 224 —
COSENTYX
$340 60 —
TREMFYA
$279 — —
KEVZARA
$219 41 —
IDACIO
$217 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

567 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in North Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record