Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nora MacZura

Gynecologic Oncology Springfield, IL Medical Doctor

NPI 1043338395 CMS profile 535337

900 N 1St St, Springfield, IL 62702

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,507

21 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Nora MacZura of Springfield, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,507 across 21 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 58th percentile of Gynecologic Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $226 5
2024 General $675 3
2023 General $34 2
2022 General $1,152 6
2021 General $125 1
2019 General $295 4

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nora MacZura
  • Gynecologic Oncology median
  • Middle half of Gynecologic Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nora MacZura were reported at $226. Among 1,179 Gynecologic Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $305 and the middle half received between $111 and $1,499.

Show as a table
Year Nora MacZura Gynecologic Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $295 $287 $113–$1,548 $163
2020 $0 $223 $59–$2,164 $114
2021 $125 $193 $68–$1,139 $132
2022 $1,152 $252 $90–$1,151 $149
2023 $34 $281 $102–$1,419 $160
2024 $675 $308 $108–$1,502 $164
2025 $226 $305 $111–$1,499 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Memic Innovative Surgery Inc. $1,046 4 payments
  2. Stryker Corporation $639 1 payment
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $231 2 payments
  4. TESARO, Inc. $187 2 payments
  5. MIMEDX Group, Inc. $130 1 payment
  6. Kerecis Limited $84 1 payment
  7. Eisai Inc. $63 3 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $31 1 payment
  9. Smith+Nephew, Inc. $25 1 payment
  10. AbbVie, Inc. $22 1 payment
  11. Other $50 4 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Travel and Lodging $1,496 3 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $958 16 payments
  3. Education $52 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Anovo Surgical System $1,046 4 payments
  2. 1788 $639 1 payment
  3. LYNPARZA $231 2 payments
  4. ZEJULA $187 2 payments
  5. Kerecis Omega3 SurgiClose $84 1 payment
  6. Kerecis Omega3 Marigen Wound Care $84 1 payment
  7. Kerecis Omega3 GraftGuide $84 1 payment
  8. Kerecis Omega3 Marigen Wound Care $84 1 payment
  9. Kerecis Omega3 Marigen Wound Care $84 1 payment
  10. Lenvima $63 3 payments
  11. Other $152 8 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 23 drugs

Part D claims

597

Median for Gynecological Oncology: 95

Drug cost

$1,440,872

Median for Gynecological Oncology: $4,719

Branded share of claims

34.8%

Median for Gynecological Oncology: 19.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Lenvima Lenvatinib Mesylate Brand 20 $705,816
Lynparza Olaparib Brand 33 $693,060
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 69 $36,848
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 29 $1,297
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 33 $735
Tramadol Hcl Generic 81 $402
Gabapentin Generic 38 $379
Letrozole Generic 23 $378
Dexamethasone Generic 19 $324
Ondansetron Odt Ondansetron Brand 29 $282

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 23 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 860 Part D prescribers listed as Gynecological Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 96 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,299,960

Of which drugs: $1,168,349

Medicare patients

206

Average age 73

Services billed

63,148

206 women, 0 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Cancer 58%
Arthritis 38%
Diabetes 26%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Osteoporosis 20%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
Depression 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, fosaprepitant, 1 mg J1453 Office 22 16,500 $1,848
Injection, carboplatin, 50 mg J9045 Office 17 469 $1,306
Injection, paclitaxel, 1 mg J9267 Office 14 14,796 $1,175
Injection, palonosetron hcl, 25 mcg J2469 Office 22 980 $728
Infusion, normal saline solution , 1000 cc J7030 Office 19 141 $289
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 24 1,268 $114
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 16 177 $92
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 18 76 $49

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Lenvima
  • Eisai Inc. $21
$21 20 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

21 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Gynecologic Oncology in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record