Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Noor Yono

Clinical Neurophysiology Stuart, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1679896526 CMS profile 1037635

1026 Se Federal Highway, Stuart, FL 34994

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$61,794

1,280 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Noor Yono of Stuart, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $61,794 across 1,280 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Clinical Neurophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,695 93
2024 General $2,234 117
2023 General $6,833 169
2022 General $11,001 183
2021 General $20,259 181
2020 General $9,418 219
2019 General $10,355 318

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Noor Yono
  • Clinical Neurophysiology median
  • Middle half of Clinical Neurophysiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Noor Yono were reported at $1,695. Among 259 Clinical Neurophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $435 and the middle half received between $121 and $1,917.

Show as a table
Year Noor Yono Clinical Neurophysiology median Middle half National median
2019 $10,355 $306 $88–$1,636 $163
2020 $9,418 $299 $85–$1,847 $114
2021 $20,259 $325 $96–$2,308 $132
2022 $11,001 $395 $106–$1,957 $149
2023 $6,833 $388 $120–$1,718 $160
2024 $2,234 $471 $137–$1,931 $164
2025 $1,695 $435 $121–$1,917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $17,678 144 payments
  2. Allergan Inc. $10,206 96 payments
  3. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $8,285 18 payments
  4. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. $6,561 47 payments
  5. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $1,685 11 payments
  6. Genzyme Corporation $1,416 42 payments
  7. Biogen, Inc. $1,340 60 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,327 100 payments
  9. UCB, Inc. $1,050 44 payments
  10. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,008 43 payments
  11. Other $11,237 675 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $39,627 33 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $21,070 1,230 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $746 9 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $190 3 payments
  5. Education $161 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY Neuroscience $20,248 69 payments
  2. NURTEC ODT $9,970 29 payments
  3. APTIOM $6,456 40 payments
  4. UBRELVY Neuroscience $5,793 21 payments
  5. QULIPTA $4,512 47 payments
  6. TYSABRI $905 41 payments
  7. SPRIX $738 100 payments
  8. KESIMPTA $710 66 payments
  9. BOTOX $709 69 payments
  10. AUBAGIO $671 25 payments
  11. Other $17,694 943 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 61 drugs

Part D claims

2,554

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$2,047,316

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

31%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Gammagard Liquid Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga Ov50 Brand 50 $627,726
Kesimpta Pen Ofatumumab Brand 57 $497,350
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 30 $199,975
Tecfidera Dimethyl Fumarate Brand 13 $120,814
Ingrezza Valbenazine Tosylate Brand 12 $97,179
Briviact Brivaracetam Brand 37 $88,769
Botox Onabotulinumtoxina Brand 43 $53,280
Epidiolex Cannabidiol (Cbd) Brand 12 $41,944
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 23 $41,544
Aptiom Eslicarbazepine Acetate Brand 26 $33,490

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 61 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 47 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$456,500

Of which drugs: $154,837

Medicare patients

1,166

Average age 74

Services billed

34,226

713 women, 453 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 61%
Depression 36%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Diabetes 27%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
COPD 20%
Osteoporosis 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 68 31,200 $154,240
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 21 194 $44

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 31 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BOTOX
$273 43 31,200
KESIMPTA
$224 57 —
QULIPTA
$151 13 —
Leqembi
$124 — —
NURTEC ODT
$116 23 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 31 with Patron

Records

1,280 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical Neurophysiology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record