Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Noelle Mundt

Nurse Practitioner Des Moines, IA Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1598726572 CMS profile 10722706

840 E University Ave, Des Moines, IA 50316

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,345

433 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Noelle Mundt of Des Moines, IA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,345 across 433 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,053 65
2024 General $1,642 90
2023 General $2,116 143
2022 General $1,168 106
2021 General $366 29

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Noelle Mundt
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Noelle Mundt were reported at $1,053. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Noelle Mundt Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $366 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $1,168 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $2,116 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $1,642 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $1,053 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,354 116 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,136 68 payments
  3. Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc $664 59 payments
  4. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $577 35 payments
  5. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $569 48 payments
  6. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $518 25 payments
  7. Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $314 15 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $290 10 payments
  9. Celgene Corporation $224 15 payments
  10. Celltrion USA Inc. $182 11 payments
  11. Other $516 31 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,151 428 payments
  2. Education $194 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. STELARA $1,053 64 payments
  2. Linzess Gi $664 59 payments
  3. LINZESS Gastroenterology $604 71 payments
  4. RINVOQ $540 32 payments
  5. ENTYVIO $496 30 payments
  6. XIFAXAN $442 36 payments
  7. SKYRIZI $437 25 payments
  8. CREON $360 39 payments
  9. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $301 19 payments
  10. DUPIXENT Immunology $290 10 payments
  11. Other $3,159 231 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 16 drugs

Part D claims

954

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$200,813

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

23.2%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 14 $112,652
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 54 $52,656
Trulance Plecanatide Brand 11 $15,701
Sod Sulf-Potass Sulf-Mag Sulf Sodium, Potassium,mag Sulfates Brand 104 $6,777
Pantoprazole Sodium Generic 181 $2,744
Omeprazole Generic 187 $2,648
Famotidine Generic 198 $1,840
Esomeprazole Magnesium Generic 14 $1,449
Lubiprostone Generic 16 $1,424
Sucralfate Generic 31 $1,087

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 16 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 7 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$21,161

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

225

Average age 74

Services billed

317

132 women, 93 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 68%
Arthritis 39%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Diabetes 25%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Depression 23%
Heart failure 16%
Atrial fibrillation 16%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 21 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
STELARA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $309
$309 — —
VOQUEZNA
  • Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $187
$187 — —
LINZESS
  • Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc $116
  • AbbVie, Inc. $62
$179 54 —
DUPIXENT
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $126
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $50
$176 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $114
$114 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 21 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

433 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Iowa

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record