Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nicholas Sutera

Internal Medicine Sarasota, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1326261462 CMS profile 105955

5350 University Pkwy, Suite 101, Sarasota, FL 34243

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,287

539 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Nicholas Sutera of Sarasota, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,287 across 539 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,684 77
2024 General $1,487 77
2023 General $1,822 95
2022 General $1,035 60
2021 General $940 64
2020 General $1,071 72
2019 General $1,248 94

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nicholas Sutera
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nicholas Sutera were reported at $1,684. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Nicholas Sutera Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,248 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,071 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $940 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,035 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,822 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,487 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,684 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,185 72 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $1,175 79 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $955 47 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $720 48 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $631 38 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $588 37 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $487 28 payments
  8. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $445 26 payments
  9. Exact Sciences Corporation $356 13 payments
  10. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $338 23 payments
  11. Other $2,406 128 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,287 539 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $937 58 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $796 47 payments
  3. Repatha $552 37 payments
  4. FARXIGA $431 24 payments
  5. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $401 23 payments
  6. ELIQUIS $400 26 payments
  7. NURTEC ODT $396 27 payments
  8. UBRELVY $334 17 payments
  9. AIMOVIG $327 25 payments
  10. VRAYLAR $323 15 payments
  11. Other $8,964 528 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 188 drugs

Part D claims

12,184

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,202,742

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

18.3%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 144 $202,219
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 163 $200,680
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 113 $114,631
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 47 $59,024
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 49 $58,914
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 13 $46,961
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 48 $45,756
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 35 $41,821
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 42 $28,176
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 14 $27,356

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 188 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 46 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$244,598

Of which drugs: $6,675

Medicare patients

754

Average age 77

Services billed

3,370

375 women, 379 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 56%
Ischemic heart disease 39%
Osteoporosis 28%
Diabetes 27%
Atrial fibrillation 23%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Cancer 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 19 19 $5,494

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $138
$138 — —
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $89
$89 — —
ELIQUIS
  • PFIZER INC. $89
$89 144 —
JARDIANCE
  • Lilly USA, LLC $85
$85 47 —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $84
$84 14 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

539 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record