Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nicholas Strobbe

Internal Medicine Port Richey, FL Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1679808612 CMS profile 1151442

9238 US Highway 19, Port Richey, FL 34668

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$37,193

195 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Nicholas Strobbe of Port Richey, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $37,193 across 195 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $716 25
2024 General $366 19
2023 General $6,614 26
2022 General $17,735 51
2021 General $11,153 33
2020 General $72 4
2019 General $537 37

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nicholas Strobbe
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nicholas Strobbe were reported at $716. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Nicholas Strobbe Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $537 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $72 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $11,153 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $17,735 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $6,614 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $366 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $716 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $28,802 67 payments
  2. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $5,476 13 payments
  3. Merz North America, Inc. $567 7 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $380 13 payments
  5. Solta Medical, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $242 3 payments
  6. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $186 6 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $142 12 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $131 6 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $117 7 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $111 6 payments
  11. Other $1,039 55 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $32,047 17 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $4,878 176 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $262 1 payment
  4. Education $6 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RYBELSUS $17,335 38 payments
  2. Ozempic $7,682 44 payments
  3. Kerendia $5,476 13 payments
  4. Xeomin musculoskeletal $270 4 payments
  5. Xeomin Dermatology $191 2 payments
  6. STEGLATRO $186 6 payments
  7. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $131 6 payments
  8. Otezla $82 5 payments
  9. Dexcom G6 Transmitter $78 3 payments
  10. Repatha $77 5 payments
  11. Other $1,926 118 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 113 drugs

Part D claims

5,697

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$455,632

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

20.1%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 72 $94,306
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 54 $69,593
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 48 $53,315
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 33 $36,710
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 29 $36,365
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 17 $25,801
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 19 $23,678
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 11 $15,606
Brilinta Ticagrelor Brand 21 $11,373
Symbicort Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate Brand 31 $10,597

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 113 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 76 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$156,226

Of which drugs: $81

Medicare patients

521

Average age 72

Services billed

3,680

298 women, 223 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 50%
Ischemic heart disease 42%
Diabetes 40%
Chronic kidney disease 38%
COPD 35%
Heart failure 27%
Atrial fibrillation 26%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 18 84 $7

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 14 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $33
$33 — —
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $32
$32 — —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $27
$27 — —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $27
$27 72 —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $25
$25 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 14 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

195 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record