Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Neva Schmelzer

Nurse Practitioner, Family Austin, TX Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1063815769 CMS profile 11175996

2200 Park Bend Dr, Bldg 1 Suite 401, Austin, TX 78758

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,012

510 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Neva Schmelzer of Austin, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,012 across 510 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,371 97
2024 General $2,146 93
2023 General $1,581 73
2022 General $2,576 109
2021 General $2,339 138

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Neva Schmelzer
  • Nurse Practitioner, Family median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Family
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Neva Schmelzer were reported at $2,371. Among 107,232 Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles paid that year, the median was $168 and the middle half received between $53 and $521.

Show as a table
Year Neva Schmelzer Nurse Practitioner, Family median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $39 $18–$91 $163
2020 $0 $32 $17–$76 $114
2021 $2,339 $124 $35–$379 $132
2022 $2,576 $141 $44–$430 $149
2023 $1,581 $154 $49–$476 $160
2024 $2,146 $165 $51–$504 $164
2025 $2,371 $168 $53–$521 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. ZOLL Services LLC (A/K/A ZOLL LifeCor Corp) $1,130 56 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $1,090 59 payments
  3. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $1,024 36 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $913 56 payments
  5. Abbott Laboratories $745 20 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $675 30 payments
  7. Impulse Dynamics (USA) Inc. $650 23 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $512 26 payments
  9. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $484 33 payments
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $457 23 payments
  11. Other $3,331 148 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,969 505 payments
  2. Education $44 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. LifeVest $1,130 56 payments
  2. EVKEEZA $817 32 payments
  3. Repatha $812 43 payments
  4. PRALUENT $612 25 payments
  5. LEQVIO $567 35 payments
  6. VERQUVO $487 27 payments
  7. XARELTO $484 33 payments
  8. JARDIANCE $474 21 payments
  9. Optimizer $436 14 payments
  10. ELIQUIS $383 19 payments
  11. Other $6,387 276 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 27 drugs

Part D claims

1,289

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$241,907

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

24.7%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 107 $72,643
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 60 $64,372
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 28 $29,183
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 29 $17,470
Praluent Pen Alirocumab Brand 21 $14,992
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 21 $14,545
Verquvo Vericiguat Brand 12 $10,299
Repatha Syringe Evolocumab Brand 11 $6,012
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 183 $2,225
Ezetimibe Generic 73 $1,942

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 27 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 7 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$17,565

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

156

Average age 77

Services billed

268

89 women, 67 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 67%
Arthritis 50%
Atrial fibrillation 38%
Diabetes 35%
Heart failure 24%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Cancer 23%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 22 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $222
$222 118 —
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $192
$192 — —
VERQUVO
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $164
$164 12 —
ENTRESTO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $109
$109 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $107
$107 28 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 22 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

510 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner, Family in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record