Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nestor Tomycz

Neurological Surgery Washington, PA Medical Doctor

NPI 1316140338 CMS profile 14459

380 W Chestnut St Ste 101, Ste 101, Washington, PA 15301

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$64,219

887 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$232,006 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Nestor Tomycz of Washington, PA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $64,219 across 887 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $232,006 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 88th percentile of Neurological Surgery profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $5,493 93
2024 General $10,610 123
2023 General $7,677 167
2022 General $8,927 178
2021 General $8,747 144
2020 General $12,646 114
2019 General $10,119 68

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nestor Tomycz
  • Neurological Surgery median
  • Middle half of Neurological Surgery
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nestor Tomycz were reported at $5,493. Among 5,467 Neurological Surgery profiles paid that year, the median was $596 and the middle half received between $159 and $3,102.

Show as a table
Year Nestor Tomycz Neurological Surgery median Middle half National median
2019 $10,119 $582 $138–$3,006 $163
2020 $12,646 $294 $76–$2,174 $114
2021 $8,747 $387 $105–$2,432 $132
2022 $8,927 $542 $139–$2,989 $149
2023 $7,677 $534 $145–$2,697 $160
2024 $10,610 $574 $155–$3,046 $164
2025 $5,493 $596 $159–$3,102 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $25,397 386 payments
  2. SI-BONE, Inc. $20,078 59 payments
  3. Stryker Corporation $6,194 304 payments
  4. Boston Scientific Corporation $5,831 23 payments
  5. RTI Surgical, Inc. $4,032 25 payments
  6. Cerapedics, Inc. $581 24 payments
  7. Medtronic USA, Inc. $372 7 payments
  8. Baxter Healthcare $213 7 payments
  9. VB Spine LLC $206 9 payments
  10. NuVasive, Inc. $188 8 payments
  11. Other $1,128 35 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $29,696 24 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $28,949 845 payments
  3. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $2,450 2 payments
  4. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $1,740 3 payments
  5. Travel and Lodging $1,385 13 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. IFUSE IMPLANT $13,262 29 payments
  2. PROCLAIM $6,794 111 payments
  3. Infinity DBS Pulse Generators $4,017 8 payments
  4. IFUSE IMPLANT SYSTEM sacroiliac joint dysfunction $3,500 3 payments
  5. EVEREST SPINAL SYSTEM $3,047 109 payments
  6. Proclaim Family of SCS IPGs $2,868 47 payments
  7. Proclaim IPG $2,484 46 payments
  8. Coflex $2,457 4 payments
  9. IFUSE IMPLANT SYSTEM sacroiliac joint dysfunction $2,000 1 payment
  10. Proclaim XR IPG $1,880 1 payment
  11. Other $19,408 519 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 1 drug

Part D claims

32

Median for Neurosurgery: 83

Drug cost

$219

Median for Neurosurgery: $872

Branded share of claims

0%

Median for Neurosurgery: 16.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mupirocin Generic 32 $219

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,779 Part D prescribers listed as Neurosurgery; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 67 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$182,920

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

318

Average age 72

Services billed

791

164 women, 154 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Depression 34%
Diabetes 30%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
COPD 19%
Osteoporosis 18%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
STRENSIQ
$20 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

887 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurological Surgery in Pennsylvania

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record