Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Neil Padgett

Internal Medicine Glen Burnie, MD Medical Doctor

NPI 1831181833 CMS profile 37389

7711 Quarterfield Rd, Suite A, Glen Burnie, MD 21061

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,308

761 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Neil Padgett of Glen Burnie, MD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,308 across 761 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,904 92
2024 General $1,959 99
2023 General $2,043 115
2022 General $2,052 124
2021 General $2,063 128
2020 General $1,955 116
2019 General $1,332 87

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Neil Padgett
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Neil Padgett were reported at $1,904. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Neil Padgett Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,332 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,955 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,063 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,052 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,043 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,959 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,904 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,068 119 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,083 58 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $934 60 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $904 60 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $831 52 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $823 43 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $595 33 payments
  8. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $476 27 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $409 21 payments
  10. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $405 21 payments
  11. Other $4,780 267 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $13,289 760 payments
  2. Education $20 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,359 74 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $1,307 70 payments
  3. FARXIGA $792 43 payments
  4. MOUNJARO $583 36 payments
  5. JARDIANCE $499 28 payments
  6. XARELTO $405 21 payments
  7. Wegovy $398 22 payments
  8. VRAYLAR $393 25 payments
  9. TRULICITY $356 25 payments
  10. ELIQUIS $342 23 payments
  11. Other $11,435 664 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 38 drugs

Part D claims

898

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$208,096

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

25.3%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 40 $69,471
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 25 $44,472
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 18 $26,931
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 22 $22,578
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 12 $15,497
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 13 $11,267
Basaglar Kwikpen U-100 Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 11 $5,294
Novolog Flexpen Insulin Aspart Brand 14 $3,264
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 97 $978
Tamsulosin Hcl Generic 40 $916

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 38 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 97 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$177,649

Of which drugs: $18,952

Medicare patients

426

Average age 75

Services billed

6,832

168 women, 258 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Chronic kidney disease 40%
Diabetes 39%
Arthritis 37%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Cancer 16%
Depression 12%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 23 23 $6,699
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 76 76 $6,199
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 22 22 $3,337
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 14 760 $77

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 37 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $139
$139 — —
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $136
$136 — —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $125
$125 40 —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $125
$125 25 —
Wegovy
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $113
$113 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 37 with Patron

Records

761 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Maryland

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record