Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Neil Kumar

Nephrology Roseburg, OR Medical Doctor

NPI 1003813015 CMS profile 317582

2410 Nw Edenbower Blvd Ste 176, Roseburg, OR 97471

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$531,702

1,247 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$10,247

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$182,329 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2024

Through program year 2025, Neil Kumar of Roseburg, OR is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $531,702 across 1,247 general payments and $10,247 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $182,329 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Nephrology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $20,172 93
2025 Research $10,247 1
2024 General $2,742 49
2023 General $40,373 93
2022 General $135,721 277
2021 General $86,221 226
2020 General $42,576 140
2019 General $203,897 369

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Neil Kumar
  • Nephrology median
  • Middle half of Nephrology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Neil Kumar were reported at $20,172. Among 8,186 Nephrology profiles paid that year, the median was $310 and the middle half received between $104 and $880.

Show as a table
Year Neil Kumar Nephrology median Middle half National median
2019 $203,897 $236 $90–$588 $163
2020 $42,576 $135 $46–$364 $114
2021 $86,221 $202 $67–$551 $132
2022 $135,721 $242 $77–$695 $149
2023 $40,373 $254 $84–$766 $160
2024 $2,742 $300 $99–$852 $164
2025 $20,172 $310 $104–$880 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $125,118 215 payments
  2. Horizon Therapeutics plc $113,296 213 payments
  3. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $60,929 108 payments
  4. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $40,201 43 payments
  5. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $37,369 113 payments
  6. Shire North American Group Inc $35,534 56 payments
  7. Akebia Therapeutics Inc $30,818 73 payments
  8. Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc. $20,849 39 payments
  9. Relypsa, Inc. $18,305 51 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $16,921 79 payments
  11. Other $32,361 257 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $284,422 165 payments
  2. Honoraria $113,170 65 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $91,717 295 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $22,354 12 payments
  5. Food and Beverage $19,112 666 payments
  6. Education $927 44 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KRYSTEXXA $113,251 212 payments
  2. FARXIGA $64,490 103 payments
  3. INVOKANA $60,701 98 payments
  4. LOKELMA $60,611 111 payments
  5. Kerendia $40,201 43 payments
  6. NATPARA (PARATHYROID HORMONE) $35,534 56 payments
  7. Auryxia $30,669 68 payments
  8. JYNARQUE Nephrology $23,194 66 payments
  9. Velphoro $20,849 39 payments
  10. JYNARQUE Nephrology $12,734 35 payments
  11. Other $51,702 390 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Hoffmann-La Roche Limited $10,247 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 100 drugs

Part D claims

9,143

Median for Nephrology: 954

Drug cost

$765,025

Median for Nephrology: $127,050

Branded share of claims

11.8%

Median for Nephrology: 17.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Filspari Sparsentan Brand 12 $126,925
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 84 $64,350
Lokelma Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Brand 84 $64,136
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 73 $47,803
Rayaldee Calcifediol Brand 39 $47,434
Velphoro Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide Brand 19 $45,078
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 38 $37,956
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 31 $37,210
Bumetanide Generic 591 $30,226
Prosol Parenteral Amino Acid 20% No.1 Brand 222 $24,128

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 100 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 9,003 Part D prescribers listed as Nephrology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 29 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$640,541

Of which drugs: $339,515

Medicare patients

720

Average age 75

Services billed

39,809

434 women, 286 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 75%
Arthritis 49%
Diabetes 43%
Heart failure 33%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
COPD 27%
Atrial fibrillation 26%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 104 9,960 $202,337
Injection, epoetin alfa, (for non-esrd use), 1000 units J0885 Office 85 19,380 $123,712
Injection, darbepoetin alfa, 1 microgram (non-esrd use) J0881 Office 57 4,800 $11,196

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 22 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Velphoro
$500 19 —
KRYSTEXXA
$209 — —
EVENITY
$119 — —
Crysvita
$55 — —
VOQUEZNA
$41 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 22 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,248 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record