Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Neil Kirschbaum

Pain Medicine Miramar, FL Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1134414386 CMS profile 1401556

1951 Sw 172Nd Ave Ste 314, Miramar, FL 33029

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,993

301 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Neil Kirschbaum of Miramar, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,993 across 301 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,728 48
2024 General $1,329 36
2023 General $732 35
2022 General $3,072 51
2021 General $1,333 54
2020 General $1,346 30
2019 General $1,453 47

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Neil Kirschbaum
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Neil Kirschbaum were reported at $1,728. Among 1,144 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $402 and the middle half received between $130 and $1,173.

Show as a table
Year Neil Kirschbaum Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,453 $409 $115–$1,311 $163
2020 $1,346 $214 $66–$666 $114
2021 $1,333 $299 $84–$899 $132
2022 $3,072 $335 $103–$1,149 $149
2023 $732 $376 $114–$1,228 $160
2024 $1,329 $387 $115–$1,173 $164
2025 $1,728 $402 $130–$1,173 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Boston Scientific Corporation $2,338 32 payments
  2. Medtronic, Inc. $1,310 44 payments
  3. Vertos Medical, Inc. $1,231 11 payments
  4. Nevro Corp. $1,008 22 payments
  5. Forte Bio-Pharma LLC $941 35 payments
  6. Abbott Laboratories $838 38 payments
  7. Nalu Medical, Inc. $568 7 payments
  8. Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc. $528 26 payments
  9. Globus Medical, Inc. $484 11 payments
  10. Medtronic USA, Inc. $333 16 payments
  11. Other $1,414 59 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,254 292 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $1,739 9 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Superion Indirect Decompression System $1,476 12 payments
  2. INTELLIS ADAPTIVESTIM $1,163 35 payments
  3. mild Device Kit $974 5 payments
  4. NALOCET $599 32 payments
  5. PROLATE Pain $582 31 payments
  6. PROLATE Pain $582 31 payments
  7. PROLATE Pain $582 31 payments
  8. Nalu Neurostimulation System $568 7 payments
  9. Omnia $537 12 payments
  10. PROLATE Pain $488 25 payments
  11. Other $6,261 217 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 36 drugs

Part D claims

4,856

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 1,220

Drug cost

$263,336

Median for Interventional Pain Management: $39,344

Branded share of claims

47.1%

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 34.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Prolate Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 16 $57,767
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 1,304 $39,290
Nalocet Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 11 $36,578
Belbuca Buprenorphine Hcl Brand 25 $18,874
Xtampza Er Oxycodone Myristate Brand 25 $17,794
Nucynta Er Tapentadol Hcl Brand 12 $14,517
Buprenorphine Generic 46 $11,156
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 472 $9,744
Tramadol Hcl Er Tramadol Hcl Brand 116 $7,167
Fentanyl Generic 66 $6,051

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 36 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,476 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 35 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$97,629

Of which drugs: $1,039

Medicare patients

164

Average age 72

Services billed

7,363

109 women, 55 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 42%
Depression 38%
Ischemic heart disease 35%
Chronic kidney disease 35%
COPD 22%
Osteoporosis 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 61 6,275 $631
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 26 43 $201
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 11 112 $9

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
PROLATE
  • Forte Bio-Pharma LLC $85
$85 16 —
ZTLido
  • Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc. $71
$71 — —
XTAMPZA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $34
$34 25 —
NALOCET
  • Forte Bio-Pharma LLC $21
$21 11 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

301 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record