Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Neena Bhatti

Waldorf, MD Medical Doctor

NPI 1114923505 CMS profile 277715

12101 Old Line Ctr, Waldorf, MD 20602

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$30,625

958 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$60,425 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Neena Bhatti of Waldorf, MD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $30,625 across 958 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $60,425 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,370 99
2024 General $2,767 121
2023 General $3,795 149
2022 General $3,745 168
2021 General $10,777 194
2020 General $5,103 124
2019 General $2,069 103

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Neena Bhatti
  • Maryland median
  • Middle half of Maryland
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Neena Bhatti were reported at $2,370. Among 20,588 Maryland profiles paid that year, the median was $166 and the middle half received between $51 and $580.

Show as a table
Year Neena Bhatti Maryland median Middle half National median
2019 $2,069 $165 $50–$633 $163
2020 $5,103 $114 $37–$407 $114
2021 $10,777 $130 $36–$480 $132
2022 $3,745 $150 $45–$529 $149
2023 $3,795 $155 $47–$557 $160
2024 $2,767 $169 $53–$600 $164
2025 $2,370 $166 $51–$580 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $7,208 38 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $5,474 149 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $3,605 157 payments
  4. Genzyme Corporation $2,359 91 payments
  5. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $1,675 65 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $1,334 72 payments
  7. Genentech USA, Inc. $1,009 40 payments
  8. Grifols USA, LLC $974 37 payments
  9. CSL Behring $864 38 payments
  10. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $788 27 payments
  11. Other $5,335 244 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $20,811 941 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $6,720 4 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $2,624 2 payments
  4. Education $470 11 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ProAir Digihaler $6,834 10 payments
  2. AirDuo RespiClick $6,720 4 payments
  3. ArmonAir Digihaler $6,720 4 payments
  4. DUPIXENT Immunology $3,610 135 payments
  5. NUCALA Respiratory $3,149 29 payments
  6. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $1,573 61 payments
  7. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,337 73 payments
  8. NUCALA Immunology $994 47 payments
  9. Xolair $982 39 payments
  10. FASENRA $923 34 payments
  11. Other $14,142 655 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 24 drugs

Part D claims

684

Median for Allergy/ Immunology: 449

Drug cost

$153,108

Median for Allergy/ Immunology: $169,700

Branded share of claims

40.2%

Median for Allergy/ Immunology: 37.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xolair Omalizumab Brand 21 $77,354
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 34 $24,257
Breztri Aerosphere Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol Brand 28 $19,478
Symbicort Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate Brand 22 $6,893
Breo Ellipta Fluticasone/Vilanterol Brand 14 $6,284
Dulera Mometasone/Formoterol Brand 13 $3,970
Azelastine-Fluticasone Azelastine/Fluticasone Brand 25 $2,597
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa Albuterol Sulfate Brand 93 $2,454
Budesonide-Formoterol Fumarate Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate Brand 12 $1,518
Montelukast Sodium Generic 69 $1,471

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 24 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,579 Part D prescribers listed as Allergy/ Immunology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 19 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$66,380

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

135

Average age 70

Services billed

3,785

108 women, 27 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 57%
Diabetes 36%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
COPD 20%
Depression 17%
Osteoporosis 10%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
$724 — —
TEZSPIRE
$230 — —
XOLAIR
$198 21 —
NUCALA
$177 — —
FASENRA
$160 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

958 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record