Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nathan Pezda

Retina Specialist Grand Rapids, MI Medical Doctor

NPI 1669602033 CMS profile 581426

5030 Cascade Rd Se, Grand Rapids, MI 49546

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,869

136 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$62,725

6 holdings reported · through program year 2025

Research they led as principal investigator

$21,252 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2024–2025

Through program year 2025, Nathan Pezda of Grand Rapids, MI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,869 across 136 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $21,252 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them. They also declared ownership or investment interests valued at $62,725 across 6 holdings.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 79th percentile of Retina Specialist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

13 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,015 35
2024 General $3,553 32
2023 General $1,949 19
2022 General $3,427 14
2021 General $1,291 13
2020 General $524 4
2019 General $1,109 19
2024 Ownership $28,421 1
2023 Ownership $11,804 1
2022 Ownership $5,000 1
2021 Ownership $5,000 1
2020 Ownership $6,250 1
2019 Ownership $6,250 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nathan Pezda
  • Retina Specialist median
  • Middle half of Retina Specialist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nathan Pezda were reported at $1,015. Among 1,235 Retina Specialist profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $175 and $1,079.

Show as a table
Year Nathan Pezda Retina Specialist median Middle half National median
2019 $1,109 $410 $157–$1,517 $163
2020 $524 $168 $65–$778 $114
2021 $1,291 $258 $101–$1,161 $132
2022 $3,427 $418 $162–$1,488 $149
2023 $1,949 $476 $178–$1,312 $160
2024 $3,553 $520 $188–$1,372 $164
2025 $1,015 $457 $175–$1,079 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Alimera Sciences, Inc. $7,027 21 payments
  2. US Retina LLC $2,352 5 payments
  3. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $990 27 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $494 19 payments
  5. Genentech USA, Inc. $416 13 payments
  6. Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $376 16 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $304 7 payments
  8. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $118 1 payment
  9. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $116 4 payments
  10. Bausch & Lomb, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $115 3 payments
  11. Other $562 20 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,517 131 payments
  2. Current or prospective ownership or investment interest $2,352 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ILUVIEN Ophthalmology $4,101 13 payments
  2. ILUVIEN treatment of diabetic macular edema in patients who have been previously treated with corticosteroid $2,990 10 payments
  3. YUTIQ $2,926 8 payments
  4. EYLEA $766 18 payments
  5. EYLEA HD $636 21 payments
  6. Syfovre $359 15 payments
  7. OZURDEX Eye Care $337 13 payments
  8. SUSVIMO $244 6 payments
  9. OZURDEX Retina $131 6 payments
  10. VABYSMO $121 5 payments
  11. Other $706 27 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 6 drugs

Part D claims

313

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$10,241

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

0%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 159 $6,000
Bromfenac Sodium Generic 18 $2,511
Gentamicin Sulfate Generic 71 $709
Timolol Maleate Generic 36 $526
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 14 $313
Latanoprost Generic 15 $181

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 44 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,303,920

Of which drugs: $1,081,268

Medicare patients

439

Average age 78

Services billed

12,698

272 women, 167 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 46%
Diabetes 38%
Chronic kidney disease 35%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Depression 24%
Atrial fibrillation 23%
Heart failure 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 109 1,024 $668,885
Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg J2777 Office 23 7,200 $198,003
Injection, aflibercept hd, 1 mg J0177 Office 17 400 $105,252

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 8 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ILUVIEN
  • Alimera Sciences, Inc. $1,463
$1,463 — —
OZURDEX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $179
$179 — —
EYLEA HD
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $106
$106 — 400
EYLEA
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $106
$106 — 1,024
Syfovre
  • Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $97
$97 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 8 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

136 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Retina Specialist in Michigan

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record