Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nathan Kakish

Internal Medicine West Dundee, IL Medical Doctor

NPI 1518975309 CMS profile 23737

1925 Huntley Rd, West Dundee, IL 60118

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$40,126

568 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Nathan Kakish of West Dundee, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $40,126 across 568 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,786 23
2024 General $24,502 72
2023 General $5,139 57
2022 General $811 19
2021 General $1,377 40
2020 General $867 55
2019 General $4,644 302

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nathan Kakish
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nathan Kakish were reported at $2,786. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Nathan Kakish Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $4,644 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $867 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,377 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $811 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $5,139 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $24,502 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,786 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $30,550 97 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,458 136 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,164 72 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,132 39 payments
  5. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $906 19 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $585 42 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $557 20 payments
  8. Amarin Pharma Inc. $424 18 payments
  9. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $314 21 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $271 19 payments
  11. Other $1,766 85 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $24,504 15 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $11,706 532 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $3,478 5 payments
  4. Education $440 16 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Repatha Cardiology $28,207 83 payments
  2. REPATHA Cardiovascular $1,763 5 payments
  3. Ozempic $884 59 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $660 29 payments
  5. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $656 47 payments
  6. FARXIGA $637 21 payments
  7. ENTRESTO $557 20 payments
  8. Otezla $509 28 payments
  9. Wegovy $485 17 payments
  10. AIMOVIG $443 22 payments
  11. Other $7,678 439 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 86 drugs

Part D claims

3,225

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$768,878

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

25.7%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 12 $166,072
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 58 $102,391
Xigduo Xr Dapaglifloz Propaned/Metformin Brand 60 $74,815
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 40 $72,932
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 23 $45,325
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 33 $40,369
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 24 $35,568
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 29 $32,076
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 24 $26,761
Toujeo Max Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 26 $24,261

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 86 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 52 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$82,770

Of which drugs: $29,727

Medicare patients

193

Average age 73

Services billed

1,915

94 women, 99 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 46%
Ischemic heart disease 42%
Diabetes 34%
Heart failure 31%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Atrial fibrillation 24%
COPD 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 21 21 $5,786
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 38 40 $3,223

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 12 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $23,395
$23,395 23 —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $244
$244 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $161
$161 33 —
ZEPBOUND
  • Lilly USA, LLC $142
$142 — —
AREXVY
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $125
$125 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 12 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

568 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record