Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nathan Fowler

Hematology & Oncology Houston, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1548475650 CMS profile 251902

1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$84,485

60 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$58,315

Paid to them · 12 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$602,317 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2023

Through program year 2025, Nathan Fowler of Houston, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $84,485 across 60 general payments and $58,315 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $602,317 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

13 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $96 1
2025 Research $115 1
2024 General $61 1
2024 Research $26,905 2
2023 General $2,590 3
2023 Research $7,867 2
2022 General $12,618 12
2021 General $10,518 10
2021 Research $355 1
2020 General $30,631 12
2020 Research $11,753 2
2019 General $27,971 21
2019 Research $11,320 4

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nathan Fowler
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nathan Fowler were reported at $96. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Nathan Fowler Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $27,971 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $30,631 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $10,518 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $12,618 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $2,590 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $61 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $96 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA $12,700 4 payments
  2. Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. $11,625 1 payment
  3. Kite Pharma, Inc. $8,887 11 payments
  4. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $7,500 2 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $6,444 1 payment
  6. TG Therapeutics, Inc. $5,662 10 payments
  7. Genentech USA, Inc. $5,576 4 payments
  8. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $4,844 2 payments
  9. Celgene Corporation $4,783 9 payments
  10. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $4,499 3 payments
  11. Other $11,965 13 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $63,436 17 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $12,967 12 payments
  3. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for an accredited or certified continuing education program $4,000 1 payment
  4. Food and Beverage $1,686 25 payments
  5. Honoraria $1,500 1 payment
  6. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $836 3 payments
  7. Education $61 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Oncology TA $12,700 4 payments
  2. XPOVIO $11,625 1 payment
  3. Yescarta $6,847 8 payments
  4. CALQUENCE $6,444 1 payment
  5. UKONIQ $5,662 10 payments
  6. Revlimid $4,495 5 payments
  7. COPIKTRA $4,350 1 payment
  8. KYMRIAH $4,011 6 payments
  9. Rituxan $1,910 2 payments
  10. TAZVERIK $1,561 2 payments
  11. Other $1,147 11 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novartis Pharma AG $26,200 1 payment
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $23,797 10 payments
  3. Celgene Corporation $8,318 1 payment

Records

72 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record