Doctor of Optometry Program year 2025 Reported 2022–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nathan Climo

Optometrist Bradenton, FL Doctor of Optometry

NPI 1861122533 CMS profile 11328622

805 Lighthouse Dr, Bradenton, FL 34212

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,610

109 records reported · program years 2022–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2022–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Nathan Climo of Bradenton, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,610 across 109 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Optometrist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,421 38
2024 General $1,683 30
2023 General $2,720 31
2022 General $786 10

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nathan Climo
  • Optometrist median
  • Middle half of Optometrist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nathan Climo were reported at $1,421. Among 35,373 Optometrist profiles paid that year, the median was $204 and the middle half received between $87 and $464.

Show as a table
Year Nathan Climo Optometrist median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $159 $67–$371 $163
2020 $0 $72 $29–$165 $114
2021 $0 $125 $46–$292 $132
2022 $786 $162 $66–$374 $149
2023 $2,720 $177 $72–$406 $160
2024 $1,683 $188 $77–$427 $164
2025 $1,421 $204 $87–$464 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Alcon Vision LLC $2,932 43 payments
  2. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $1,229 29 payments
  3. CooperVision Inc. $667 4 payments
  4. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. $586 21 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $362 3 payments
  6. Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $141 2 payments
  7. Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. $125 1 payment
  8. Harrow Eye, LLC $125 1 payment
  9. Amgen Inc. $122 1 payment
  10. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $114 1 payment
  11. Other $206 3 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,116 105 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $994 3 payments
  3. Education $500 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. AIR OPTIX $870 3 payments
  2. DAILIES TOTAL1 Multifocal $785 2 payments
  3. Dailies Aqua Comfort Plus $785 2 payments
  4. INFUSE $625 23 payments
  5. TOTAL30 $624 20 payments
  6. Precision7 $428 8 payments
  7. MIEBO $373 3 payments
  8. XIIDRA $248 2 payments
  9. DAILIES TOTAL1 $245 3 payments
  10. DURYSTA $237 2 payments
  11. Other $1,770 29 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 11 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$68,405

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

642

Average age 74

Services billed

713

322 women, 320 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 71%
Arthritis 50%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Diabetes 20%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Cancer 17%
Atrial fibrillation 14%
Depression 14%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XDEMVY
  • Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $127
$127 — —
TYRVAYA
  • Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. $125
$125 — —
MIEBO
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $124
$124 — —
XIIDRA
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $124
$124 — —
DURYSTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $123
$123 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

109 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Optometrist in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record