Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Natasha Subramaniam

Nurse Practitioner Auburn, IN Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1558751909 CMS profile 11195345

1314 E 7Th St Ste 103, Auburn, IN 46706

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,664

277 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Natasha Subramaniam of Auburn, IN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,664 across 277 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,575 39
2024 General $1,951 48
2023 General $2,129 60
2022 General $2,293 59
2021 General $2,716 71

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Natasha Subramaniam
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Natasha Subramaniam were reported at $1,575. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Natasha Subramaniam Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $2,716 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $2,293 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $2,129 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $1,951 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $1,575 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,379 77 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,016 25 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $993 22 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $929 29 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $912 22 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $899 23 payments
  7. Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. $676 10 payments
  8. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $271 3 payments
  9. Pharmacosmos Therapeutics Inc. $229 2 payments
  10. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $221 4 payments
  11. Other $2,139 60 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,643 274 payments
  2. Education $21 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. UBRELVY $1,315 26 payments
  2. VRAYLAR $962 44 payments
  3. Auvelity $676 10 payments
  4. QULIPTA $579 10 payments
  5. MOUNJARO $516 16 payments
  6. RYBELSUS $448 14 payments
  7. Wegovy $382 6 payments
  8. BREZTRI $374 9 payments
  9. AREXVY $363 3 payments
  10. EVENITY $354 5 payments
  11. Other $6,142 188 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 83 drugs

Part D claims

3,416

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$265,849

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

21.7%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 61 $59,022
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 14 $32,343
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 20 $31,159
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 21 $26,515
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 17 $22,325
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 14 $21,428
Breztri Aerosphere Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol Brand 29 $20,362
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 12 $8,339
Breo Ellipta Fluticasone/Vilanterol Brand 13 $6,156
Gemtesa Vibegron Brand 11 $3,873

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 83 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 29 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$21,481

Of which drugs: $2,961

Medicare patients

106

Average age 70

Services billed

486

68 women, 38 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 67%
Arthritis 47%
Depression 24%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Diabetes 19%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
COPD 19%
Atrial fibrillation 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 17 17 $1,302

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Auvelity
  • Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. $329
$329 — —
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $156
$156 — —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $140
$140 — —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $137
$137 — —
ZEPBOUND
  • Lilly USA, LLC $136
$136 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

277 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Indiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record