Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Natalie Dishman

Internal Medicine Morgan City, LA Medical Doctor

NPI 1225036833 CMS profile 282623

1126 Marguerite St, Morgan City, LA 70380

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,798

1,013 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Natalie Dishman of Morgan City, LA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,798 across 1,013 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,526 137
2024 General $2,411 137
2023 General $2,358 145
2022 General $2,508 142
2021 General $2,624 158
2020 General $1,750 107
2019 General $2,622 187

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Natalie Dishman
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Natalie Dishman were reported at $2,526. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Natalie Dishman Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,622 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,750 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,624 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,508 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,358 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,411 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,526 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,904 125 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,577 83 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,294 88 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $992 75 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $986 48 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $762 52 payments
  7. Astellas Pharma US Inc $701 31 payments
  8. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $641 40 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $535 27 payments
  10. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $512 34 payments
  11. Other $6,893 410 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $16,532 1,008 payments
  2. Education $266 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,114 64 payments
  2. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,041 71 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $1,011 54 payments
  4. FARXIGA $686 30 payments
  5. UBRELVY $648 47 payments
  6. XARELTO $641 40 payments
  7. VRAYLAR $563 34 payments
  8. QULIPTA $545 37 payments
  9. ELIQUIS $450 37 payments
  10. Kerendia $416 18 payments
  11. Other $14,913 940 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 275 drugs

Part D claims

27,892

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$2,524,020

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

24.6%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 217 $234,285
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 528 $211,390
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 225 $144,695
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 129 $143,197
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 167 $141,050
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 233 $121,099
Vraylar Cariprazine Hcl Brand 87 $108,185
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 114 $83,732
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 111 $76,090
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 54 $57,835

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 275 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 65 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$150,652

Of which drugs: $757

Medicare patients

558

Average age 76

Services billed

9,877

346 women, 212 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 46%
Ischemic heart disease 40%
Diabetes 38%
Depression 30%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
COPD 23%
Heart failure 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 76 6,843 $649
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 14 14 $69

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 45 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
$292 87 —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$165 114 —
AIRSUPRA
$121 — —
FARXIGA
$100 233 —
UBRELVY
$94 20 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 45 with Patron

Records

1,013 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Louisiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record