Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nastran Hashemi

Internal Medicine Valencia, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1891009163 CMS profile 2782395

23838 Valencia Blvd Ste 304, Valencia, CA 91355

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,112

100 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$99,521 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2022–2023

Through program year 2025, Nastran Hashemi of Valencia, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,112 across 100 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $99,521 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 84th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $774 19
2024 General $501 11
2023 General $619 27
2022 General $740 30
2021 General $389 9
2020 General $16 1
2019 General $75 3

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nastran Hashemi
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nastran Hashemi were reported at $774. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Nastran Hashemi Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $75 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $16 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $389 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $740 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $619 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $501 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $774 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $454 11 payments
  2. Smith+Nephew, Inc. $451 7 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $296 13 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $236 10 payments
  5. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $191 8 payments
  6. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $180 7 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $159 7 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $137 1 payment
  9. Stryker Corporation $137 5 payments
  10. Novo Nordisk Inc $125 1 payment
  11. Other $746 30 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,112 100 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. OFEV Respiratory $277 3 payments
  2. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $212 10 payments
  3. XARELTO $191 8 payments
  4. VERQUVO $185 7 payments
  5. QULIPTA $173 7 payments
  6. OFEV Respiratory $147 5 payments
  7. STRAVIX $146 1 payment
  8. Repatha $137 1 payment
  9. OASIS $135 1 payment
  10. Ozempic $125 1 payment
  11. Other $1,797 72 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 136 drugs

Part D claims

4,945

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$825,773

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

23.9%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Omeprazole-Sodium Bicarbonate Omeprazole/Sodium Bicarbonate Brand 42 $162,066
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 60 $109,300
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 77 $86,786
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 70 $61,322
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 133 $60,329
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 42 $41,452
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 66 $40,688
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 28 $24,289
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 25 $20,313
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 20 $20,252

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 136 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 76 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$910,874

Of which drugs: $462,151

Medicare patients

261

Average age 76

Services billed

5,305

147 women, 114 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 66%
Diabetes 57%
Heart failure 49%
Ischemic heart disease 49%
Depression 45%
Chronic kidney disease 44%
COPD 41%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 45 132 $128

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
OFEV
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $151
$151 — —
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $137
$137 — —
NUCALA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $33
$33 — —
FASENRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $30
$30 — —
VERQUVO
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $30
$30 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

100 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record