Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nani Kanen

Internal Medicine Burlingame, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1548358435 CMS profile 297595

1838 El Camino Real, Suite 100, Burlingame, CA 94010

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,901

687 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Nani Kanen of Burlingame, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,901 across 687 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,206 104
2024 General $2,474 130
2023 General $2,025 106
2022 General $1,578 80
2021 General $2,048 107
2020 General $1,450 93
2019 General $1,121 67

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nani Kanen
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nani Kanen were reported at $2,206. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Nani Kanen Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,121 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,450 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,048 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,578 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,025 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,474 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,206 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,522 85 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,459 110 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $929 42 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $721 30 payments
  5. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $623 33 payments
  6. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $590 35 payments
  7. Indivior Inc. $558 30 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $512 21 payments
  9. Astellas Pharma US Inc $383 17 payments
  10. ITI, Inc. $353 13 payments
  11. Other $5,251 271 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,883 686 payments
  2. Education $17 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $925 72 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $869 69 payments
  3. VRAYLAR $749 42 payments
  4. MOUNJARO $550 21 payments
  5. BREZTRI $486 21 payments
  6. XIFAXAN $482 28 payments
  7. AIRSUPRA $415 17 payments
  8. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $390 16 payments
  9. APLENZIN $340 20 payments
  10. XTAMPZA $323 18 payments
  11. Other $9,457 490 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 160 drugs

Part D claims

8,964

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$921,767

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

18.1%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 172 $217,628
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 108 $109,318
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 83 $81,398
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 44 $47,064
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 42 $46,427
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 26 $34,944
Trintellix Vortioxetine Hydrobromide Brand 26 $27,165
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 14 $24,504
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 26 $21,723
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 16 $18,702

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 160 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 37 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$468,747

Of which drugs: $169,110

Medicare patients

338

Average age 75

Services billed

17,983

224 women, 114 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Arthritis 43%
Osteoporosis 39%
Diabetes 38%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Depression 25%
Ischemic heart disease 18%
COPD 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 68 6,600 $136,310
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 37 37 $3,027
Vaccine for pneumococcal polysaccharide for injection beneath the skin or into muscle, patient 2 years or older 90732 Office 14 15 $1,939
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 24 24 $1,904
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 23 61 $58

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 38 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $198
$198 — —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $164
$164 — —
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $156
$156 — —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $149
$149 26 —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $149
$149 172 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 38 with Patron

Records

687 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record