Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nanette Pettry

Nurse Practitioner El Paso, TX Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1326062845 CMS profile 11047824

4801 Alberta Ave, El Paso, TX 79905

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,820

510 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Nanette Pettry of El Paso, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,820 across 510 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,735 73
2024 General $6,622 75
2023 General $2,403 134
2022 General $2,434 128
2021 General $1,625 100

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nanette Pettry
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nanette Pettry were reported at $2,735. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Nanette Pettry Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $1,625 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $2,434 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $2,403 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $6,622 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $2,735 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $3,117 13 payments
  2. Madrigal Pharmaceuticals $3,084 14 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $2,292 110 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,401 75 payments
  5. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $1,028 46 payments
  6. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $981 69 payments
  7. Ardelyx, Inc. $733 21 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $659 27 payments
  9. Celgene Corporation $401 31 payments
  10. Aimmune Therapeutics, Inc. $278 15 payments
  11. Other $1,845 89 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,248 494 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $4,118 5 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $1,223 5 payments
  4. Education $232 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. VOQUEZNA $3,043 10 payments
  2. REZDIFFRA $2,573 6 payments
  3. XIFAXAN $1,005 70 payments
  4. STELARA $955 61 payments
  5. ENTYVIO $835 37 payments
  6. IBSRELA $733 21 payments
  7. ZEPOSIA $555 35 payments
  8. TREMFYA $535 20 payments
  9. SKYRIZI Immunology $531 26 payments
  10. SKYRIZI Immunology $523 18 payments
  11. Other $6,019 313 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 44 drugs

Part D claims

2,149

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$865,892

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

25.8%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xifaxan Rifaximin Brand 112 $388,155
Entyvio Vedolizumab Brand 13 $128,921
Zenpep Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 43 $106,306
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 90 $98,395
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 34 $76,422
Mesalamine Generic 51 $9,841
Famotidine Generic 397 $7,927
Ursodiol Generic 23 $6,150
Omeprazole Generic 299 $5,569
Colestipol Hcl Generic 37 $4,164

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 44 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 9 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$22,495

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

203

Average age 74

Services billed

332

131 women, 72 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 57%
Diabetes 39%
Chronic kidney disease 35%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Osteoporosis 24%
COPD 23%
Depression 23%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 21 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VOQUEZNA
  • Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $2,671
$2,671 — —
REZDIFFRA
  • Madrigal Pharmaceuticals $2,573
$2,573 — —
VELSIPITY
  • PFIZER INC. $176
$176 — —
IBSRELA
  • Ardelyx, Inc. $154
$154 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $132
$132 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 21 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

510 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record