Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nancy Kienka

Nurse Practitioner, Family Oklahoma City, OK Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1316353568 CMS profile 11205464

8900 Se 15Th St, Oklahoma City, OK 73110

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,619

602 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Nancy Kienka of Oklahoma City, OK is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,619 across 602 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,909 121
2024 General $1,990 120
2023 General $1,959 126
2022 General $1,838 110
2021 General $1,923 125

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nancy Kienka
  • Nurse Practitioner, Family median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Family
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nancy Kienka were reported at $1,909. Among 107,232 Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles paid that year, the median was $168 and the middle half received between $53 and $521.

Show as a table
Year Nancy Kienka Nurse Practitioner, Family median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $39 $18–$91 $163
2020 $0 $32 $17–$76 $114
2021 $1,923 $124 $35–$379 $132
2022 $1,838 $141 $44–$430 $149
2023 $1,959 $154 $49–$476 $160
2024 $1,990 $165 $51–$504 $164
2025 $1,909 $168 $53–$521 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,785 116 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,196 60 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,180 89 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,064 73 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $987 67 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $762 49 payments
  7. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $386 15 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $356 22 payments
  9. Exact Sciences Corporation $284 18 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $253 14 payments
  11. Other $1,367 79 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,619 602 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,059 81 payments
  2. QULIPTA $864 52 payments
  3. Ozempic $785 55 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $759 53 payments
  5. FARXIGA $682 29 payments
  6. UBRELVY $674 42 payments
  7. AIRSUPRA $553 22 payments
  8. JARDIANCE $465 29 payments
  9. MOUNJARO $392 28 payments
  10. NURTEC ODT $388 28 payments
  11. Other $7,023 434 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 60 drugs

Part D claims

1,742

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$200,134

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

18.3%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 38 $52,250
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 27 $35,902
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 24 $29,138
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 13 $20,067
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 15 $17,423
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 11 $16,465
Janumet Xr Sitagliptin Phos/Metformin Hcl Brand 11 $8,442
Levothyroxine Sodium Generic 100 $1,452
Gabapentin Generic 94 $1,340
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa Albuterol Sulfate Brand 37 $1,285

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 60 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 106 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$89,584

Of which drugs: $6,190

Medicare patients

132

Average age 73

Services billed

4,874

105 women, 27 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 46%
Depression 39%
Ischemic heart disease 38%
Diabetes 35%
Osteoporosis 27%
COPD 22%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 23 23 $3,514
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 63 63 $1,358
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 20 1,211 $119

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 25 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
  • Lilly USA, LLC $161
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $87
$248 — —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $248
$248 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $168
$168 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $136
$136 27 —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $111
$111 13 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 25 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

602 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner, Family in Oklahoma

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record