Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nadine Yassa

Neurology with Special Qualifications in Child Neurology Roseville, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1689656647 CMS profile 348131

991 Reserve Drive, Suite A, Roseville, CA 95678

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,236

604 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Nadine Yassa of Roseville, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,236 across 604 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 86th percentile of Neurology with Special Qualifications in Child Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,981 90
2024 General $3,347 100
2023 General $2,065 107
2022 General $3,831 116
2021 General $1,288 71
2020 General $661 36
2019 General $2,061 84

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nadine Yassa
  • Neurology with Special Qualifications in Child Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology with Special Qualifications in Child Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nadine Yassa were reported at $1,981. Among 1,228 Neurology with Special Qualifications in Child Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $276 and the middle half received between $87 and $1,522.

Show as a table
Year Nadine Yassa Neurology with Special Qualifications in Child Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,061 $262 $68–$1,313 $163
2020 $661 $188 $46–$1,222 $114
2021 $1,288 $183 $45–$1,356 $132
2022 $3,831 $229 $72–$1,177 $149
2023 $2,065 $269 $93–$1,195 $160
2024 $3,347 $300 $98–$1,428 $164
2025 $1,981 $276 $87–$1,522 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. LivaNova USA, Inc. $3,224 28 payments
  2. UCB, Inc. $2,277 174 payments
  3. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $1,296 33 payments
  4. SK Life Science, Inc. $1,103 39 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $862 51 payments
  6. Biogen, Inc. $798 48 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $755 23 payments
  8. EMD Serono, Inc. $667 19 payments
  9. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $385 16 payments
  10. Argenx US, Inc. $268 7 payments
  11. Other $3,601 166 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $13,415 587 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $1,776 4 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $23 1 payment
  4. Education $21 12 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Briviact $1,817 156 payments
  2. VNS Therapy Cardiology/Vascular Diseases $1,722 10 payments
  3. INGREZZA $1,296 33 payments
  4. VNS Therapy Neurology $1,113 4 payments
  5. QULIPTA $459 30 payments
  6. UBRELVY $446 24 payments
  7. XCOPRI $373 14 payments
  8. Mavenclad $348 10 payments
  9. VUMERITY $333 23 payments
  10. TYSABRI $307 24 payments
  11. Other $7,097 315 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 40 drugs

Part D claims

1,730

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$288,218

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

27.2%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xcopri Cenobamate Brand 70 $93,017
Austedo Deutetrabenazine Brand 12 $73,105
Briviact Brivaracetam Brand 26 $53,215
Tiagabine Hcl Generic 37 $15,991
Divalproex Sodium Er Divalproex Sodium Brand 96 $8,537
Fycompa Perampanel Brand 11 $8,512
Lacosamide Generic 28 $5,869
Carbamazepine Er Carbamazepine Brand 48 $4,772
Levetiracetam Generic 179 $4,163
Zonisamide Generic 51 $2,136

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 40 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 34 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$456,851

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

322

Average age 69

Services billed

3,314

186 women, 136 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 66%
Arthritis 49%
Depression 33%
Diabetes 32%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Osteoporosis 20%
COPD 17%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 22 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Briviact
  • UCB, Inc. $434
$434 26 —
INGREZZA
  • Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $338
$338 — —
Fintepla
  • UCB, Inc. $164
$164 — —
XCOPRI
  • SK Life Science, Inc. $118
$118 70 —
Nayzilam
  • UCB, Inc. $112
$112 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 22 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

604 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology with Special Qualifications in Child Neurology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record