Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2020–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Morgan Hatfield

Allergy & Immunology N Charleston, SC Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1104396910 CMS profile 5691344

7555 Northside Dr, N Charleston, SC 29420

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,826

292 records reported · program years 2020–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2020–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Morgan Hatfield of N Charleston, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,826 across 292 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 63rd percentile of Allergy & Immunology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,897 82
2024 General $1,577 63
2023 General $1,264 53
2022 General $1,078 49
2021 General $991 44
2020 General $19 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Morgan Hatfield
  • Allergy & Immunology median
  • Middle half of Allergy & Immunology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Morgan Hatfield were reported at $1,897. Among 2,466 Allergy & Immunology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,140 and the middle half received between $272 and $2,892.

Show as a table
Year Morgan Hatfield Allergy & Immunology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $594 $163–$1,512 $163
2020 $19 $426 $106–$1,233 $114
2021 $991 $638 $157–$1,708 $132
2022 $1,078 $790 $205–$1,961 $149
2023 $1,264 $852 $220–$2,147 $160
2024 $1,577 $865 $203–$2,267 $164
2025 $1,897 $1,140 $272–$2,892 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Genzyme Corporation $1,761 58 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,363 67 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $730 32 payments
  4. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $543 17 payments
  5. Genentech USA, Inc. $515 22 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $398 24 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $326 16 payments
  8. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $279 12 payments
  9. BioCryst US Sales Co., LLC $131 6 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $116 6 payments
  11. Other $662 32 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,578 287 payments
  2. Education $248 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. DUPIXENT Immunology $3,143 109 payments
  2. FASENRA $729 39 payments
  3. Xolair $515 22 payments
  4. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $467 15 payments
  5. NUCALA $417 18 payments
  6. TEZSPIRE Respiratory $342 16 payments
  7. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $314 14 payments
  8. TEZSPIRE Inflammation $298 20 payments
  9. AIRSUPRA $185 7 payments
  10. ENTYVIO $132 7 payments
  11. Other $1,659 80 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 15 drugs

Part D claims

388

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$216,812

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

54.1%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 17 $75,132
Xolair Omalizumab Brand 15 $51,543
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 46 $46,193
Spiriva Respimat Tiotropium Bromide Brand 23 $18,827
Breo Ellipta Fluticasone/Vilanterol Brand 18 $7,812
Symbicort Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate Brand 22 $6,975
Epinephrine Generic 21 $3,677
Arnuity Ellipta Fluticasone Furoate Brand 13 $2,640
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa Albuterol Sulfate Brand 56 $1,270
Ipratropium Bromide Generic 21 $731

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 15 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 18 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$264,129

Of which drugs: $231,650

Medicare patients

180

Average age 73

Services billed

14,769

134 women, 46 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 69%
Arthritis 52%
Osteoporosis 26%
Diabetes 25%
Depression 19%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
COPD 16%
Cancer 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, omalizumab, 5 mg J2357 Office 14 3,420 $102,290

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 19 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $408
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $280
$688 17 —
XOLAIR
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $78
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $74
$151 15 3,420
FASENRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $143
$143 — —
TEZSPIRE
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $103
  • Amgen Inc. $34
$137 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $94
$94 46 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 19 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

292 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Allergy & Immunology in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record