Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Monica Shah

Rheumatology Trinity, FL Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1518411602 CMS profile 1739943

9332 State Road 54 Ste 301, Trinity, FL 34655

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$101,420

620 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Monica Shah of Trinity, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $101,420 across 620 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $57,343 186
2024 General $36,334 148
2023 General $2,877 93
2022 General $1,687 71
2021 General $877 42
2020 General $1,159 48
2019 General $1,144 32

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Monica Shah
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Monica Shah were reported at $57,343. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Monica Shah Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,144 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,159 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $877 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,687 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $2,877 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $36,334 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $57,343 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UCB, Inc. $48,718 124 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $22,668 60 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $9,727 115 payments
  4. Genzyme Corporation $6,310 25 payments
  5. Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $5,460 4 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $2,101 97 payments
  7. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $1,723 2 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $537 18 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $489 13 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $469 26 payments
  11. Other $3,219 136 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $47,587 23 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $28,670 12 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $16,397 533 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $8,430 42 payments
  5. Education $336 10 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Bimzelx $47,505 84 payments
  2. TREMFYA $24,180 57 payments
  3. SIMPONI ARIA $17,768 34 payments
  4. KEVZARA $6,459 21 payments
  5. LUPKYNIS $5,460 4 payments
  6. RINVOQ $3,658 68 payments
  7. Cimzia $1,096 39 payments
  8. EVENITY $772 31 payments
  9. HUMIRA $628 23 payments
  10. SAPHNELO $491 16 payments
  11. Other $7,290 339 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 38 drugs

Part D claims

2,126

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,315,489

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

24.1%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 50 $324,492
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 28 $196,775
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 31 $173,446
Cimzia (2 Pack) Certolizumab Pegol Brand 29 $166,263
Actemra Tocilizumab Brand 34 $127,966
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 18 $106,798
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 11 $73,663
Avsola Infliximab-Axxq Brand 11 $51,039
Evenity (2 Syringes) Romosozumab-Aqqg Brand 13 $32,453
Prolia Denosumab Brand 13 $22,355

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 38 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 30 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$643,433

Of which drugs: $564,101

Medicare patients

346

Average age 73

Services billed

51,570

282 women, 64 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 55%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Depression 30%
Diabetes 28%
COPD 24%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 13 11,130 $95,440
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 45 4,020 $83,180
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 13 60 $6

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Bimzelx
$15,730 — —
LUPKYNIS
$5,460 — —
TREMFYA
$3,254 — —
SIMPONI ARIA
$2,692 — —
RINVOQ
$2,491 50 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

620 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record