Nurse Practitioner Program year 2024 Reported 2021–2024 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Molly Reeves

Nurse Practitioner, Family Auburn, AL Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1912356858 CMS profile 10885368

1907 S College St Ste 201, Auburn, AL 36832

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$158,240

758 records reported · program years 2021–2024

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2024

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2024, Molly Reeves of Auburn, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $158,240 across 758 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2024 General $17,995 126
2023 General $50,269 221
2022 General $64,521 253
2021 General $25,455 158

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Molly Reeves
  • Nurse Practitioner, Family median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Family
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Molly Reeves were reported at $0. Among 107,232 Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles paid that year, the median was $168 and the middle half received between $53 and $521.

Show as a table
Year Molly Reeves Nurse Practitioner, Family median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $39 $18–$91 $163
2020 $0 $32 $17–$76 $114
2021 $25,455 $124 $35–$379 $132
2022 $64,521 $141 $44–$430 $149
2023 $50,269 $154 $49–$476 $160
2024 $17,995 $165 $51–$504 $164
2025 $0 $168 $53–$521 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2024
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $64,985 227 payments
  2. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $37,061 46 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $32,680 69 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $16,629 109 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $1,001 56 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $813 22 payments
  7. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $733 22 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $677 34 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $631 36 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $515 31 payments
  11. Other $2,514 106 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2024
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $86,921 76 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $52,416 83 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $16,470 594 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $2,275 2 payments
  5. Education $158 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2024
  1. SIMPONI ARIA $69,193 93 payments
  2. RINVOQ $56,969 205 payments
  3. TREMFYA $47,088 95 payments
  4. STELARA $37,105 47 payments
  5. Enbrel $15,362 56 payments
  6. SKYRIZI $6,347 20 payments
  7. Cimzia $1,001 56 payments
  8. ACTHAR $733 22 payments
  9. BENLYSTA $677 34 payments
  10. SAPHNELO $677 20 payments
  11. Other $6,858 325 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 79 drugs

Part D claims

3,847

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$2,308,580

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

20.7%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 82 $556,722
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 39 $345,592
Cimzia (2 Pack) Certolizumab Pegol Brand 22 $213,392
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 29 $206,295
Otezla Apremilast Brand 29 $138,838
Cosentyx Sensoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 17 $124,883
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 19 $107,637
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 11 $93,703
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 18 $87,200
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 15 $83,239

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 79 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 10 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$19,885

Of which drugs: $151

Medicare patients

170

Average age 70

Services billed

628

134 women, 36 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 37%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Diabetes 26%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
COPD 24%
Depression 24%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 36 224 $150

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $6,586
$6,586 82 —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $4,858
$4,858 — —
SIMPONI ARIA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $4,612
$4,612 — —
SAPHNELO
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $243
$243 — —
Cimzia
  • UCB, Inc. $193
$193 22 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

758 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner, Family in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record